Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans - Kotaku In Action 2

Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a sexual assault case that it was “problematic” for a lower court judge to refer to the alleged victim as a “woman,” implying that the more appropriate term should have been “person with a vagina.” Nobody in the case was trans (archive.is)

posted 282 days ago by YesMovement 282 days ago by YesMovement +66 / -0

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– ZeroPercentCamoIndex 4 points 282 days ago +4 / -0

Lol. I can't even figure out the woke logic in this. Seems like boomers flailing and confusing themselves. Does that mean we can refer to ftm trannies as 'person with a vagina' and mtf trannies as 'person born with a cock'? Try it and see, I'll bet this will suddenly become doubleplusungood speech again.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– dbomb 3 points 282 days ago +3 / -0

tradition and logic = bad. Progress and submission by using new approved terms = good.

permalink parent save report block reply