Sundance from CTH has read the text of the TikTok ban law, and notes that what is in the bill is radically different than what is being reported.
If TikTok data collection was the issue, the law would be structured to ban foreign data collection. That’s not what this is. This is a law written to give the Executive Branch the power to define any platform as “foreign owned” by the service provider (even if domestic) and the substance of the content contained and/or distributed.
Read the text of the bill yourself here (PDF warning!)
Make no mistake, they mean to control information. This is bigger than TikTok.
--edit--
I've actually read the bill, and it doesn't do what was asserted it does.
I've seen too many times where a law has been introduced, critics have pointed out the potential misuse of that law down the line. Proponents have dismissed their concerns as overblown, flawed and not the intention of the law. Then the critics ultimately get proven right when said law gets misused.
I've seen it with terror legislation, misogyny legislation and it will happen with websites and apps in time.
It's almost as if the laws are intentionally written so these "loopholes" can be misused later