I was reading this article: https://archive.is/ozrZh
My question is what constitutes a "hate campaign"? If you write some anti-Trump article on reddit and then gets upvoted by 200k people, is that a hate campaign? Why isn't reddit moderating 99% of their content?
From my position, a actual "Hate Campaign" would be an organized attempt to (literally) harass a target with hate mail to the point that they are actually restricted from operating a normal life. It can be very closely related to a "Smear Campaign" which is explicitly defamatory.
So for example, back in the 90's, if something turned into a media circus, it's possible that the target of the reporting could be getting thousands of letters every day, thousands of phone calls every day, and even hourly visitors. Double the level of danger if most of those callers are saying shit like "I'll find you and I'll kill you". If your mail can't be delivered properly, then you can't respond to your normal bills and communications. If people won't stop calling you on the old land lines, it means you can't even make calls out of your home. If people keep coming to your door at literally all hours, you can genuinely be made to feel unsafe.
This did occasionally happen, but it was rarely organized. When it was, it was typically organized by the media. Tonya Harding is one that sticks out to me because she was locked in an apartment complex. The news basically doxed her location and it allowed people to start doing all of the above. The phone didn't stop ringing at all hours until she pulled it out of the wall. The media & papperazi surrounded her complex for days, to the point it filled out the parking lot. They then contacted and harassed the property owner; who decided that she needed to leave, and walked to the room and basically asked her to leave. She didn't feel like it was safe to come out, because of the baying journalist mob that was screaming at her through the doors and windows standing a foot or two behind the apartment manager. Then, one of them came up with the idea to call a tow-truck company and have her car towed away so that they could get pictures of her. They did exactly that, and got pictures of her basically in a disheveled state chasing after her car, while they all took billions of pictures of her, screamed at her, and then ran with the headline that she was attacking journalists because she was clearly insane.
She, obviously, Tonya Harding committed battery, but it kind of shows you the lengths that the media is willing to go. Fundamentally, they wanted pictures of her, and wanted to construct a narrative about her, so they sent out a journalist lynch mob to use any mechanism to get that. Not only that, but when you look into it, you'll see that most lynchings and race riots seem to also be directly tied to media actions. You don't hate journalists enough.
My problem with this definition is that "operating a normal life" is subjective and prone to abuse. In the case of SBI, I don't doubt that at least a few guys did insult/ threaten SBI staff as a result of the coverage the entire thing got. I expect the usual suspects to post articles with screenshots of tweets in the next few days. However this happens if you criticize anyone on the internet, I'm old enough to remember what happened if you dared criticize Disney Star Wars on main subs. I bet if I even criticize Taylor Swift on a Taylor Swift forum I'll get plenty of death threats. So where do we draw the line for what constitutes a "hate campaign" in the online medium?
Would be nice if we got an actual definition before we get a woke one where "directed against marginalized" or some other bullshit.
It was like that almost everywhere, even outside the internet. I remember expressing my frustration to a buddy of mine at the time stating, "I cannot even say no thank you anymore! It is either all praise or you are a bigot!" as I explained why I had stopped being a Star Wars fan.
I guess divesting myself from Star Wars early to escape the brightsided narrative was a small blessing as I can only imagine how much angrier I would be at the continued defilement of a once cherished brand.
I took me a while to realize that this is on par for anything the left takes over though. Eat the shit or else.