I have created a list human rights people are at serious risk of losing due to the globalist backed terrorist menace known as the regressive left, tell me suggestions for some more stuff to add:
-
Weapon rights, as there is no excuse for mentally sound trustworthy people to own whatever the hell they want.
-
Apoliticality, as the regressive left literally does not believe in this despite the fact it fosters creativity.
-
Protection from censorship and wrongful termination over non extremist stuff like hate facts.
-
Freedom of association including the ability to reject unwanted sexual advances from unwanted partners like trannies. Yes only whites should have raical protections.
-
Access to media non-compliant with woke culture, especially if it does not promote anything bad.
-
Single sex spaces.
-
The ability to reject woke culture and literally all the regressive left's beliefs while being fully protected in your ability to criticize both for being extremist garbage.
-
The ability to protect yourself and your family from popular often government backed pesudosciences such as gender theory, and scientific/medical fraud such as what happened with mRNA vaccines.
-
The right to proper emergency response, especially from both police and medical personnel.
-
The right to not be persecuted or mistreated by the government if you did nothing wrong.
-
Freedom of movement, as global warming extremism and other extremist eco movments are a threat to travel and vehicle ownership.
-
Energy freedom, again eco extremism.
-
Financial freedom and security as the regressive left want to blacklist their enemies from payment processing and banking.
-
The right to be protected from undesirables.
Careful. They've argued similar claims with "healthcare." And our argument is that what they want is essentially slavery, as that stuff is a service, and you do not have the right to someone's service.
The right to take action in absence of proper emergency response would be better. Essentially vigilantism, but things are so bad in some places, I can't believe that hasn't become more common.
Yeah I was thinking he meant the right the freedom of movement including not blocking ambulances on public roads. If that happens then whatever means is necessary to clear the road should be allowed.
Yeah, there is no right to emergency services