Oh look, you've graduated from watching remedial retard study material to the AP retard classes.
You've already burnt your bridges here I imagine, so I doubt many are even going to give this shit a chance, but personally I gave this latest channel you've chosen to let speak for you a shot.
The whole thing ends without resolving anything, he never bothers to explain why causing harm to the victim is a compelling reason not to rape in the absence of god or societal rules, he just calls it "common decency" and doesn't explain it. Without an explanation you might as well be calling it "God's grace" and it's just a faith with different nomenclature.
One possible mechanic to explain it is rather simple but leads to some uncomfortable conclusions - humans have biologically inherent empathy, even outside of societal norms. It's uncomfortable because if empathy is not purely societally learned, then like all biologically inherent traits it will have a range of distributions. You then have to consider how much the distribution of empathy correlates with ethnicity, it could very well differ greatly like height and skin colour do, and perhaps some ethnicities have significantly less "common decency" than others.
first we need proof that a god exist. 2nd, we also need to lay the ground work. if god does exist. his will flows through us. freewill. thus. we as humans are able to make good, and bad decisions. from a christian viewpoint. morality exist. and if exist. it exist all around us and thus outside of the christian world. so factually speaking here. since morality is objective, thus outside of christian control. anyone can exercise their morality.
So. so long as someone engages in good behavior. their morals are no different from the christians. even if that person does not believe in the concept of a god. because if morality exist outside of god, and thus the bible. anyone has access to it. now to answer your questions.
What's stopping an atheist from raping? well good point. but to answer that. i'll have to answer your question with another question. which is. what is to stop a christian from raping someone? if you can answer me that. i'll tell you why atheists don't have a reason to rape, once you tell me why so many christians do it.
so the whole moral grandstanding is this. why do christians rape. while under an all powerful god. if you can answer me why christians do this. i'll answer you! why atheist choose not to rape.
Oh no, it's regressing again. I can't answer you for the Christians, I'm not one of them. I'd have thought that I'm arguing from the position of atheism should have been obvious by now.
So now that weird rhetorical hostage situation has been defused, you can go ahead and explain why you think atheists choose not to rape. The clickbait promise has me waiting with bated breath.
Oh look, you've graduated from watching remedial retard study material to the AP retard classes.
You've already burnt your bridges here I imagine, so I doubt many are even going to give this shit a chance, but personally I gave this latest channel you've chosen to let speak for you a shot.
The whole thing ends without resolving anything, he never bothers to explain why causing harm to the victim is a compelling reason not to rape in the absence of god or societal rules, he just calls it "common decency" and doesn't explain it. Without an explanation you might as well be calling it "God's grace" and it's just a faith with different nomenclature.
One possible mechanic to explain it is rather simple but leads to some uncomfortable conclusions - humans have biologically inherent empathy, even outside of societal norms. It's uncomfortable because if empathy is not purely societally learned, then like all biologically inherent traits it will have a range of distributions. You then have to consider how much the distribution of empathy correlates with ethnicity, it could very well differ greatly like height and skin colour do, and perhaps some ethnicities have significantly less "common decency" than others.
first we need proof that a god exist. 2nd, we also need to lay the ground work. if god does exist. his will flows through us. freewill. thus. we as humans are able to make good, and bad decisions. from a christian viewpoint. morality exist. and if exist. it exist all around us and thus outside of the christian world. so factually speaking here. since morality is objective, thus outside of christian control. anyone can exercise their morality.
So. so long as someone engages in good behavior. their morals are no different from the christians. even if that person does not believe in the concept of a god. because if morality exist outside of god, and thus the bible. anyone has access to it. now to answer your questions.
What's stopping an atheist from raping? well good point. but to answer that. i'll have to answer your question with another question. which is. what is to stop a christian from raping someone? if you can answer me that. i'll tell you why atheists don't have a reason to rape, once you tell me why so many christians do it.
Did you reply to the wrong comment or did I mindbreak you into plagiarizing unrelated rebuttals?
You even left empty gaps to quote things that could actually make your comment make sense as a reply to someone else.
so the whole moral grandstanding is this. why do christians rape. while under an all powerful god. if you can answer me why christians do this. i'll answer you! why atheist choose not to rape.
Oh no, it's regressing again. I can't answer you for the Christians, I'm not one of them. I'd have thought that I'm arguing from the position of atheism should have been obvious by now.
So now that weird rhetorical hostage situation has been defused, you can go ahead and explain why you think atheists choose not to rape. The clickbait promise has me waiting with bated breath.