Because it sounds more like you had an ideological shift, not a logical shift.
but after hearing from other people...
You're listening to the wrong people.
immigration actually effects more non white people... for a whole host of reasons... namely jobs. so immigration en mass is a problem... but it more so effects everyone. not just white people.
This is very surface level, and intentionally misleading. Firstly, it starts in the middle. America used to be +90% white. Immigration obviously affected white people more. Secondly, this argument completely ignores demographics, which is the whole point of white genocide.
Let's for the sake of argument say nonwhites feel some of the effects of immigration more than white people. Again, this is only happening in white majority countries, too.
Here's the question. Are nonwhites in white countries, being flooded with more nonwhites...in danger of global extinction due to immigration? Obviously not. With only a few exceptions, such as the Native Americans, who are a perfect example of what getting invaded and outbred will do to your population and your bloodlines.
2nd one which is the one that made me write off white genocide as a concept.
I'll hear you out, but it seems pretty silly to write off a whole concept - with a lot of backing evidence behind it, to boot - based on one argument. Better be a damn good one!
was race mixing. and genetically speaking their is no such thing as a "pure race" anyways.
Nope. It's retarded.
Race isn't real, white people aren't real, so they can't be genocided. Miss me with that. Again, all these arguments are surface level bad faith arguments that exist solely to deny obvious reality. Basic linguistic trickery.
so "white" "black" etc. technically speaking. aren't just races anymore.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't mean you can't change it more, or change one group - whites or blacks - disproportionately.
Also, the idea that the goal is to change whites is a bit of a dodge. Whites just need to stop having kids at replacement level, and import nonwhites instead, and the scales keep falling. Less white people, more everyone else...leads to eventual white extinction.
a simple dna test shows us most if not almost everyone has mixed blood within them.
No, no, no, no, no. If 'race' isn't real, there's certainly nothing such as 'mixed blood.' And again, it ignores proportionality. Some people are more or less 'mixed' than others. Someone could, for example, be 99% "white" and 1% black. Or they could be 50%/50%, or 1%/99% in the other direction. Those are clearly not the same. They're all "mixed," but they're obviously all distinct. And, while not entirely accurate if you want to play semantics, those people are clearly, respectively, white, mixed, and black.
The concept of "race mixing" being the down fall of white people...
Again, was never really the argument. It's a part of the argument, but not the whole thing. Also, again, disingenuous. If you have a country with 90%-100% white people, race mixing will be extremely rare. If you have a country with 50% white people, race mixing will get more common. Clearly the second scenario is going to lead to less white people. Clearly, immigration/race mixing does have an effect on demographics. It's clear as day, and only academics and indoctrinated normies will tell you otherwise.
...race mixing also effects other races to! so another example of "white genocide" also applying to non white people.
Yeah, no. It's nowhere near as common and, again, just proximity. White people are the primary ones living in "mixed" or "majority" countries. Asians live in Asian countries, blacks largely live in black countries, and such. Much less race mixing if you have homogeneous society. This is just another dodge argued by people trying desperate to do everything they can to avoid and obfuscate the issue.
and as we all know, history never has any bad white people oh no sir we bob! all the bad people throughout history have only been non white people. and the good guys have been only ever white don't ya know.
Another massive strawman. This was never the argument. Not even worth responding to. You're either being stupid, intentionally obtuse, or both. Of course there are bad white people.
White replacement in the media. isn't the same as white replacement in the real world.
No, they're not the same. But both are happening. One thing not being the same as another doesn't disprove the other.
however it is bad. don't get me wrong, and indeed 1 sided. but this shit that's happening to whites now... it's a slap on the wrist compared to what non-whites of the past had to go through.
Wait, so white genocide is real, but it's more polite than other genocides you want to dig up from the past?
Again, i'm not denying you whites aren't getting your asses handed to you legally. and their is a stigma in being proud of your race... in a largely white country i get that. but the stuff you guys are talking about... aren't even effecting just you guys. it's kinda effecting everyone. so i don't really care all that much. i mean i do but i just fail to see how this is a white issue.
How is it not? What other race is discriminated against in the US? And certainly so openly? Name how any of the "totally not white issues" are affecting other races.
if genocide is simply being slowly edged out of the gene pool... that's not really a bad way to go. especially if no one dies. so i don't see the problem in this.
So, racial sterilization would be fine? It's about the same, what's the difference?
kinda seemed like if america had closed boarders. this wouldn't be an issue.
Wait. Immigration isn't causing white genocide, but if it weren't for immigration white people wouldn't be getting genocided? Are you for real? *sigh*
i wonder why whites don't wanna go to non-white countries. but non-whites flock to white countries. really weird.
Nonwhite countries aren't paying white people to come to the country illegally? Nonwhite countries aren't giving free room and board and monthly stipends to white people who come to the countries illegally?
i don't give 2 shits about a tribe that sold their land for beeds. and as for racial extinction... who cares?
Yeah, and I'm the Nazi.
i know that in gene wise. white is a thing. pure white... not so much.
Yeah, but you're the only one talking about racial purity. And you failed to grasp my example of 1% white versus 99% white. Just because something isn't "pure" doesn't mean it can't still be diluted.
and yeah no shit sherlock. if whites were 90-100% of the pop. race mixing would amount to shit.
Again, you're making the argument that immigration does negatively impact the native population.
in real life... where? nobody likes the en mass of foreigners. nobody likes the bullshit the left are doing with history.
So, these things that are happening aren't, or don't matter, because you claim people don't like them? Irrelevant, because they're being done to us.
just the consequence of living in a mixed race country.
Again, we weren't a "mixed race country" until it was brutally forced on us.
the problem your seeing isn't something new. but something that's been there since this country inception.
Do you no longer believe it's good to help white people? Do you no longer believe there are double standards at play?
What changed? Especially when they keep bragging about it.
Because it sounds more like you had an ideological shift, not a logical shift.
You're listening to the wrong people.
This is very surface level, and intentionally misleading. Firstly, it starts in the middle. America used to be +90% white. Immigration obviously affected white people more. Secondly, this argument completely ignores demographics, which is the whole point of white genocide.
Let's for the sake of argument say nonwhites feel some of the effects of immigration more than white people. Again, this is only happening in white majority countries, too.
Here's the question. Are nonwhites in white countries, being flooded with more nonwhites...in danger of global extinction due to immigration? Obviously not. With only a few exceptions, such as the Native Americans, who are a perfect example of what getting invaded and outbred will do to your population and your bloodlines.
I'll hear you out, but it seems pretty silly to write off a whole concept - with a lot of backing evidence behind it, to boot - based on one argument. Better be a damn good one!
Nope. It's retarded.
Race isn't real, white people aren't real, so they can't be genocided. Miss me with that. Again, all these arguments are surface level bad faith arguments that exist solely to deny obvious reality. Basic linguistic trickery.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't mean you can't change it more, or change one group - whites or blacks - disproportionately.
Also, the idea that the goal is to change whites is a bit of a dodge. Whites just need to stop having kids at replacement level, and import nonwhites instead, and the scales keep falling. Less white people, more everyone else...leads to eventual white extinction.
No, no, no, no, no. If 'race' isn't real, there's certainly nothing such as 'mixed blood.' And again, it ignores proportionality. Some people are more or less 'mixed' than others. Someone could, for example, be 99% "white" and 1% black. Or they could be 50%/50%, or 1%/99% in the other direction. Those are clearly not the same. They're all "mixed," but they're obviously all distinct. And, while not entirely accurate if you want to play semantics, those people are clearly, respectively, white, mixed, and black.
Again, was never really the argument. It's a part of the argument, but not the whole thing. Also, again, disingenuous. If you have a country with 90%-100% white people, race mixing will be extremely rare. If you have a country with 50% white people, race mixing will get more common. Clearly the second scenario is going to lead to less white people. Clearly, immigration/race mixing does have an effect on demographics. It's clear as day, and only academics and indoctrinated normies will tell you otherwise.
Yeah, no. It's nowhere near as common and, again, just proximity. White people are the primary ones living in "mixed" or "majority" countries. Asians live in Asian countries, blacks largely live in black countries, and such. Much less race mixing if you have homogeneous society. This is just another dodge argued by people trying desperate to do everything they can to avoid and obfuscate the issue.
Another massive strawman. This was never the argument. Not even worth responding to. You're either being stupid, intentionally obtuse, or both. Of course there are bad white people.
No, they're not the same. But both are happening. One thing not being the same as another doesn't disprove the other.
Wait, so white genocide is real, but it's more polite than other genocides you want to dig up from the past?
How is it not? What other race is discriminated against in the US? And certainly so openly? Name how any of the "totally not white issues" are affecting other races.
So, racial sterilization would be fine? It's about the same, what's the difference?
Wait. Immigration isn't causing white genocide, but if it weren't for immigration white people wouldn't be getting genocided? Are you for real? *sigh*
Nonwhite countries aren't paying white people to come to the country illegally? Nonwhite countries aren't giving free room and board and monthly stipends to white people who come to the countries illegally?
Yeah, and I'm the Nazi.
Yeah, but you're the only one talking about racial purity. And you failed to grasp my example of 1% white versus 99% white. Just because something isn't "pure" doesn't mean it can't still be diluted.
Again, you're making the argument that immigration does negatively impact the native population.
So, these things that are happening aren't, or don't matter, because you claim people don't like them? Irrelevant, because they're being done to us.
Again, we weren't a "mixed race country" until it was brutally forced on us.
Absolute bullshit, as I laid out multiple times.
Stop replying to month old posts with your retarded essays.
You have the IQ of a brick. Get some help.