Republicans just bypassing the primary in that state might've been too much.
They should. Primaries as a government managed election have no business even existing IMO. That's where the political parties (which are private entities) choose who gets their endorsement for the actual election. Why are the states even involved in the first place?
One, they shouldn't be meddling in the business of political parties, which are, again, private entities. And second, I don't want public dollars spent on assisting the Democrats and Republicans in deciding who they are going to run in an election. If you're a private entity, you are free from government intrusion, but you also don't get any government money to pay for your operations.
They should. Primaries as a government managed election have no business even existing IMO. That's where the political parties (which are private entities) choose who gets their endorsement for the actual election. Why are the states even involved in the first place?
One, they shouldn't be meddling in the business of political parties, which are, again, private entities. And second, I don't want public dollars spent on assisting the Democrats and Republicans in deciding who they are going to run in an election. If you're a private entity, you are free from government intrusion, but you also don't get any government money to pay for your operations.