Quick way to determine who the bigger threat is: name three politicians who DO espouse white nationalism - name three politicians who DON’T espouse zionism

posted 359 days ago by Graphenium 359 days ago by Graphenium +67 / -8

If you can’t that means zionists control the US government and white nationalists are a non-entity

33 comments

33 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (33)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– thisisanaccountname 1 point 356 days ago +1 / -0

Except someone actually cast their vote as “present” you fucking moron, thus making it logical to include in a break down of the voting patterns of congress.

Nearly an identical number of House members abstain from every recent vote related to Palestine, Iran, Hamas, or Israel. Must mean absolutely nothing.

settle the issue once and for all

The issue is that there are 3 politicians that are anti-zionists. That's it. That's the whole issue. The amount that are zionists is probably uncountable versus the number that aren't, but you didn't focus on that.

forum slider

You dumb nigger. What am I sliding? I'm in this single thread, however many comments deep, that's days old now, posting about the direct topic. And I even agree with you that zionists have an insane amount of power in the US and white supremacists have zero power.

With what percentage of votes did Trump win in 2016?

If you are trying to use the votes to determine the level of support or the opposite, the relevant question is what percentage of the voting population voted for Trump.

abandon this sock already

Whenever you stop responding, I'll probably just go back to full time lurking again.

Edited to add:

You have zero ability to guess how those who didn’t vote at all would have voted

I can infer, but sure, I can't be sure.

and considering the overall trends they probably all would have voted in support of cucking to the zionists.

But you can! And you can contradict yourself in the same sentence, too. Very impressive, very jew like. Bravo, Shlomo.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Graphenium [S] 1 point 356 days ago +1 / -0

The issue is that there are 3 politicians that are anti-zionists.

Actually, the main issue is your lack of reading comprehension...

If you are trying to use the votes to determine the level of support or the opposite, the relevant question is what percentage of the voting population voted for Trump.

So you say that trump won with 27% of the vote? You don’t see how you’re a fucking retard for counting people who didn’t vote in a study of “how did people vote”? Who did the people who didn’t vote “support”?

Well, anyway, since I don’t expect anything productive from continuing this past this point, best of luck with your undiagnosed downs syndrome

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– thisisanaccountname 1 point 356 days ago +1 / -0

If that's the number, then yes. He won with the support of 27% of the voters. There is a difference between voters and votes, but you must not have developed object permanence and can't understand that simple fact. If you're not special needs, you can infer that some of the voters who stayed home did so for a reason, not just because extenuating circumstances prevented them from voting. Include in those reasons would be who they did or did not support. Remember Bernie Bros?

Bye faggot, and have a merry Christmas!

permalink parent save report block reply