I remember another "study" a while back claiming a similar thing, so this is really nothing new, just the usual 1984esque rewriting of history (and reality itself).
I felt like having a chuckle so I read the "article".
They state that women have better physical endurance (due to the action of estrogen), and since pre historic hunting was all about exhausting your prey women had an advantage. They even claim that women have longer strides because birthing hips allow their legs to rotate more.
First thing I have to point out is that to illustrate the piece they used a picture of big titted bimbo Raquel Welch in a movie where she was cast simply to be displayed in loincloths for hungry male eyeballs.
The people who believe this kind of shit really look at a pimped out harlot in some shitty movie as an example of their imagined stronk independent cave woman.
But OK, I'll indulge them. Let's say this was the case. Why are women marathoners slower than men? Why every job that requires physical endurance is dominates by men?
What happened to those neolithic queefing rockets?
Did they have their magical vagina turbo sabotaged by oppressive (yet inferior) men?
The goddamn patriarchy can't keep getting away with this...
I think men's longer legs would add a better advantage for stride length than women's wide hips. I bet 5 seconds of rudimentary testing would prove me right.
Strange that the marathon record is held by a man considering women have so much better endurance... Very strange...
Yeah, the fact that with longer legs men will have larger strides is completely forgotten here. Just like the hand eye coordination that TheMerleOfHaggard mentioned.
And even with any possible benefit that a female hormonal composition might have on endurance, it's completely overshadowed by the even greater benefits that high levels of testosterone give you.
I remember another "study" a while back claiming a similar thing, so this is really nothing new, just the usual 1984esque rewriting of history (and reality itself).
I felt like having a chuckle so I read the "article". They state that women have better physical endurance (due to the action of estrogen), and since pre historic hunting was all about exhausting your prey women had an advantage. They even claim that women have longer strides because birthing hips allow their legs to rotate more.
First thing I have to point out is that to illustrate the piece they used a picture of big titted bimbo Raquel Welch in a movie where she was cast simply to be displayed in loincloths for hungry male eyeballs.
The people who believe this kind of shit really look at a pimped out harlot in some shitty movie as an example of their imagined stronk independent cave woman.
But OK, I'll indulge them. Let's say this was the case. Why are women marathoners slower than men? Why every job that requires physical endurance is dominates by men?
What happened to those neolithic queefing rockets? Did they have their magical vagina turbo sabotaged by oppressive (yet inferior) men?
The goddamn patriarchy can't keep getting away with this...
I think men's longer legs would add a better advantage for stride length than women's wide hips. I bet 5 seconds of rudimentary testing would prove me right.
Strange that the marathon record is held by a man considering women have so much better endurance... Very strange...
Yeah, the fact that with longer legs men will have larger strides is completely forgotten here. Just like the hand eye coordination that TheMerleOfHaggard mentioned.
And even with any possible benefit that a female hormonal composition might have on endurance, it's completely overshadowed by the even greater benefits that high levels of testosterone give you.