Men are better at compartmentalizing and keeping their emotions from interfering too much with their reasoning. Which has a net benefit in multiple respects to the creative process. IE, consistency, rationale, steadier application of emotions on the characters' responses and behavior, etc.
There's also that one repeated study I've read about where women have the tendency of projecting their own personality and applying it to characters, where-as men are more able to do the opposite and actually try to put themselves in the characters' shoes and "become" the character.
And additionally, a lot of the writers being hired as of late in general have a tendency of being a little unhinged anyway. Even more-so when they're female diversity hires.
Men are better at compartmentalizing and keeping their emotions from interfering too much with their reasoning. Which has a net benefit in multiple respects to the creative process. IE, consistency, rationale, steadier application of emotions on the characters' responses and behavior, etc.
There's also that one repeated study I've read about where women have the tendency of projecting their own personality and applying it to characters, where-as men are more able to do the opposite and actually try to put themselves in the characters' shoes and "become" the character.
And additionally, a lot of the writers being hired as of late in general have a tendency of being a little unhinged anyway. Even more-so when they're female diversity hires.