Forbes is the one positing that dichotomy, not (necessarily) the critic they cite, yet they call the critic a "Myopic embarrassment to journalism." I'd say "Pot, meet kettle", but in this case I think the kettle is a nice stainless steel and the pot is rusted straight through.
Forbes is the one positing that dichotomy, not (necessarily) the critic they cite, yet they call the critic a "Myopic embarrassment to journalism." I'd say "Pot, meet kettle", but in this case I think the kettle is a nice stainless steel and the pot is rusted straight through.