I think that (taken with some charity) this actually makes a lot of sense in the context of everything else he says about the 'Talmudic' mindset.
He's not so much positing "Jews don't exist" as simply brushing aside the rhetorical//semantic quagmire of 'Jewishness' in order to state his point, establishing up front that he's not going to indulge Talmudic "heads I win, tails you lose" sophistry, instead redirecting the frame entirely.
Two examples to illustrate the intentionally obtuse morass he's side-stepping:
The Israeli constitution grants the "Right of Return" to all Jews. The Israeli constitution then proceeds to define a "Jew" as someone permitted to immigrate to Israel by way of the "Right of Return."
Just one microcosmic instance of something we've all seen play out ad infinitum on the global stage. What is 'Jewishness'? An ethnicity? A religion? A nationality? Pay attention, take notes, and soon you'll begin to notice Jewishness is whatever permutation or combination of these three (or others) serves immediate rhetorical purposes, deftly twisting and morphing, coming and going and even turning on its head in any fashion required to addlepate whichever stupid goy stepped out of line, however contritely, timidly or momentarily.
Soros? Oh he's totally secular, and besides he threw a bunch of Jews under the bus during The Shoah™. Stop juxtaposing how he spends his money with footage of rabbis pontificating on the proper servile station of goyim the world over.
What's that? Louis CK's Netflix special that debuted like a week before he got the #metoo dragnet starts with a whole routine about how stupid the goyim are because they number years preceding the birth of Christ in reverse order, etc...? Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks. 'White' and 'male' are clearly the only characteristics salient to his misbehavior regarding women.
Talmudic indeed. Pains me to acknowledge it as positively ninja-esque.
Speaking of, the very term anti-Semitic, their bread-and-butter, their perpetual top-deck, is at its core nothing but obfuscation and mendacity. Anyone worth their salt will tell you that 'semitic' is more of a linguistic than ethnic descriptor, and furthermore that it encompasses a much wider category than "Jews" in either case, regardless of that distinction.
If you've been following along though, it isn't hard to grok the utility of misdirecting attention away from your tribe in the very process of tirelessly advancing its interests to the express detriment of others.
Imagine a world where an infamous Goebbels quote rings uncannily perspicacious in retrospect. Oh wait, you don't have to 🤡.
That in a nutshell is why Owen doesn't care.
Compare and contrast other circular 🤡🌎 Greatest Hits such as "My penis is feminine, bigot." and "I changed some definitions. Now 1+1=3, and you're racist, bigot."
did Owen seriously just say that?
I think that (taken with some charity) this actually makes a lot of sense in the context of everything else he says about the 'Talmudic' mindset.
He's not so much positing "Jews don't exist" as simply brushing aside the rhetorical//semantic quagmire of 'Jewishness' in order to state his point, establishing up front that he's not going to indulge Talmudic "heads I win, tails you lose" sophistry, instead redirecting the frame entirely.
Two examples to illustrate the intentionally obtuse morass he's side-stepping:
The Israeli constitution grants the "Right of Return" to all Jews. The Israeli constitution then proceeds to define a "Jew" as someone permitted to immigrate to Israel by way of the "Right of Return."
Just one microcosmic instance of something we've all seen play out ad infinitum on the global stage. What is 'Jewishness'? An ethnicity? A religion? A nationality? Pay attention, take notes, and soon you'll begin to notice Jewishness is whatever permutation or combination of these three (or others) serves immediate rhetorical purposes, deftly twisting and morphing, coming and going and even turning on its head in any fashion required to addlepate whichever stupid goy stepped out of line, however contritely, timidly or momentarily.
Soros? Oh he's totally secular, and besides he threw a bunch of Jews under the bus during The Shoah™. Stop juxtaposing how he spends his money with footage of rabbis pontificating on the proper servile station of goyim the world over.
What's that? Louis CK's Netflix special that debuted like a week before he got the #metoo dragnet starts with a whole routine about how stupid the goyim are because they number years preceding the birth of Christ in reverse order, etc...? Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks. 'White' and 'male' are clearly the only characteristics salient to his misbehavior regarding women.
Talmudic indeed. Pains me to acknowledge it as positively ninja-esque.
Speaking of, the very term anti-Semitic, their bread-and-butter, their perpetual top-deck, is at its core nothing but obfuscation and mendacity. Anyone worth their salt will tell you that 'semitic' is more of a linguistic than ethnic descriptor, and furthermore that it encompasses a much wider category than "Jews" in either case, regardless of that distinction.
If you've been following along though, it isn't hard to grok the utility of misdirecting attention away from your tribe in the very process of tirelessly advancing its interests to the express detriment of others.
Imagine a world where an infamous Goebbels quote rings uncannily perspicacious in retrospect. Oh wait, you don't have to 🤡.
That in a nutshell is why Owen doesn't care.
Compare and contrast other circular 🤡🌎 Greatest Hits such as "My penis is feminine, bigot." and "I changed some definitions. Now 1+1=3, and you're racist, bigot."