...from sexualized threats texted to students that administrators say were from players on the football team.
I haven't looked too into it, but they're trying to make it sound like intimidation, even calling it 'threats.' Wasn't it just leaked talks from the boys? That's not threatening, since it wasn't addressed to any would-be "victims." It was a private conversation, until someone decided to try to ruin them, for whatever reason. Also, the only example I saw wasn't explicitly even about rape, just sex. Considering it was all fantasy, it may have very well been consensual in the fantasy.
Highschool boys fantasy about sex with highschool girls. More at eleven!
Sexual? Yes. Rape? No. Threat? Definitely not.
Students staged a walkout...
Students decided to not go to school. More, also at eleven!
"There was a lot of people sharing their stories," a student told FOX 13. " Which is very heart-touching and heartfelt to me because I also shared my story about things involving the football team, things involving the boys that go here. There was a lot of people called out."
Holding signs and wearing pink in solidarity, more than a hundred teenagers from Chief Sealth High School came together to rally Friday afternoon.
This just keeps getting more cringe.
Students we talked to said the victims those text messages were directed towards were the young women who organized Friday's rally. FOX 13 talked with one young woman who said she was one of the victims.
I'm getting very "he's a witch!" vibes here.
This young woman told FOX 13, she doesn't believe the school issued a punishment appropriate for what the young men were accused of.
Uhm.
"I feel like, for people that were basically planning out doing something sexual, they should be way more punished than just like a little suspension," she said.
"Planning?" Really? Teenagers said they wanted to have sex, at least in the examples I saw. There was no "plan."
"I felt disgusted and something that I said in my speech to everybody was that." a student said.
Their interviews are just like "I did a speech, I'm so brave."
"I feel unsafe now. I feel very unsafe at this school thinking that these men are thinking about women in this way. And it just made me feel very disgusted and my heart goes out to the girls they were talking about."
Ugh. This is getting so frustrating. Ridiculous drama-mongering. I like the switching from 'boys and girls' to 'women and men' and then back to victimized 'girls' too.
"I'm one of the people that spoke multiple times at this rally," a student said.
It's frankly amazing how many times this sort of line came up in such a short article.
It's also offering support to the students who were subject to these messages.
I haven't looked too into it, but they're trying to make it sound like intimidation, even calling it 'threats.' Wasn't it just leaked talks from the boys? That's not threatening, since it wasn't addressed to any would-be "victims." It was a private conversation, until someone decided to try to ruin them, for whatever reason. Also, the only example I saw wasn't explicitly even about rape, just sex. Considering it was all fantasy, it may have very well been consensual in the fantasy.
Highschool boys fantasy about sex with highschool girls. More at eleven!
Sexual? Yes. Rape? No. Threat? Definitely not.
Students decided to not go to school. More, also at eleven!
Narcissism alert, narcissism alert! Wee-ooo-wee-ooo.
This just keeps getting more cringe.
I'm getting very "he's a witch!" vibes here.
Uhm.
"Planning?" Really? Teenagers said they wanted to have sex, at least in the examples I saw. There was no "plan."
Their interviews are just like "I did a speech, I'm so brave."
Ugh. This is getting so frustrating. Ridiculous drama-mongering. I like the switching from 'boys and girls' to 'women and men' and then back to victimized 'girls' too.
It's frankly amazing how many times this sort of line came up in such a short article.
Because of course.
Imagine learning how men actually feel about you and deciding that not only do you not like it, it should be illegal.