Debates that aren't about major safety hazards are not worth having. There is almost always a clear objective truth on one side and then there is the opposition that wants something that is harmful and dangerous to come about regardless of the cost. The opposition always proceeds to use emotional manipulation to assert its dominance over the uncomfortable but necessary truth. This inevitably leads to a lot of unnecessary suffering, with the end result being that the opposition says "oopsies, nobody could have foreseen the disastrous outcomes of our policies" while the silenced truthsayers are foaming at the mouth in the background. The opposition proceeds to collect their bonus checks and T-shirts and disappear into the fog.
Debates that aren't about major safety hazards are not worth having. There is almost always a clear objective truth on one side and then there is the opposition that wants something that is harmful and dangerous to come about regardless of the cost. The opposition always proceeds to use emotional manipulation to assert its dominance over the uncomfortable but necessary truth. This inevitably leads to a lot of unnecessary suffering, with the end result being that the opposition says "oopsies, nobody could have foreseen the disastrous outcomes of our policies" while the silenced truthsayers are foaming at the mouth in the background. The opposition proceeds to collect their bonus checks and T-shirts and disappear into the fog.