Pessimistic view: either tossed (one example does not prove discrimination), or settled out of court so that they can still deny wrongdoing.
The problem I see is that they could simply deny having seen the video evidence until after the initial charges were made (not sure if that would be best practice, but immediacy is part of the game). He called himself in and admitted to killing the guy. All the DA needs is selective understanding of the situation (violence over chips, stabbing 5 times) to push an aggressive charge.
I'm pretty sure there was a post here about the initial incident. I hope this guy routes that piece of shit DA in court.
Pessimistic view: either tossed (one example does not prove discrimination), or settled out of court so that they can still deny wrongdoing.
The problem I see is that they could simply deny having seen the video evidence until after the initial charges were made (not sure if that would be best practice, but immediacy is part of the game). He called himself in and admitted to killing the guy. All the DA needs is selective understanding of the situation (violence over chips, stabbing 5 times) to push an aggressive charge.