A small amount of this 'greenhouse effect' is absolutely necessary for life on earth. Without it, nights would plunge down into sub-zero temperatures, which as you know, is bad news for living creatures.
That's where the problem comes in. While I admit that balance is key to the continued sustenance of the ecosystem, the overfed corporate gluttons admit that eliminating carbon from the atmosphere permanently is their goal. Opposing such an omnicidal policy does not make this group "against everything".
On the contrary, being against the total eradication of a great majority of life on earth is a justifiable stance.
Next, I would like to explain why this advertisement sends a terrible environmental message.
For one, it depicts "mother nature" as an arrogant, unlikable individual who talks down to everyone. This instills a sense of resentment against the cause of protecting the environment as a whole, with the justification of "she's an arrogant bitch, she deserves it".
Secondly, the advertisement sweeps the process of mining, refining, assembly and production of apple merchandise under the rug with bland, often unbelievable statements from overfed corporate heads. It also ignores just how harmful apple products are to the environment due to their inherent design flaws, yet at the end, the advertisement makes the viewer think that Apple has nature's approval.
Two things wrong with that.
They don't.
They had to let a plant wilt, then use CGI to bring it back to feign approval of nature. That's fraud, man.
Also, all Octavia Spencer managed to do here is to alienate actual environmental causes and sucked up to Apple's marketing department for some fast cash.
A small amount of this 'greenhouse effect' is absolutely necessary for life on earth. Without it, nights would plunge down into sub-zero temperatures, which as you know, is bad news for living creatures.
That's where the problem comes in. While I admit that balance is key to the continued sustenance of the ecosystem, the overfed corporate gluttons admit that eliminating carbon from the atmosphere permanently is their goal. Opposing such an omnicidal policy does not make this group "against everything".
On the contrary, being against the total eradication of a great majority of life on earth is a justifiable stance.
Next, I would like to explain why this advertisement sends a terrible environmental message.
For one, it depicts "mother nature" as an arrogant, unlikable individual who talks down to everyone. This instills a sense of resentment against the cause of protecting the environment as a whole, with the justification of "she's an arrogant bitch, she deserves it".
Secondly, the advertisement sweeps the process of mining, refining, assembly and production of apple merchandise under the rug with bland, often unbelievable statements from overfed corporate heads. It also ignores just how harmful apple products are to the environment due to their inherent design flaws, yet at the end, the advertisement makes the viewer think that Apple has nature's approval.
Two things wrong with that.
Also, all Octavia Spencer managed to do here is to alienate actual environmental causes and sucked up to Apple's marketing department for some fast cash.