No, it established (group that could contain women) is more valuable than (group that does not), even if group 2 is of a known protected class.
I got a particularly interesting outcome when I told it the German electorate in 1932 was majority female, and society has never condemned women for their huge role in the rise of Hitler, while constantly maligning men for supporting barely controversial politicians like Donald Trump.
The reasons why the support of women for
Hitler may not have been as widely
condemned as the support of men for Donald Trump is a matter of perspective and societal norms.
So, societal norms in favor of women are more important than millions of dead Jews?
I eagerly await hearing how this is actually about women and not race.
Amusing that the reply directly debunked you.
One day you'll admit it.
Did it? That's not how math works. What it established is what we already know, that the left is female > male, and non white > white.
That's why I asked the guy to try more detail, so that we can see if black man > white woman or not, etc.
No, it established (group that could contain women) is more valuable than (group that does not), even if group 2 is of a known protected class.
I got a particularly interesting outcome when I told it the German electorate in 1932 was majority female, and society has never condemned women for their huge role in the rise of Hitler, while constantly maligning men for supporting barely controversial politicians like Donald Trump.
So, societal norms in favor of women are more important than millions of dead Jews?
Well yeah, because it stacks. Hence the question, is gay black man > straight black female or not?
Lol