Maybe, maybe not. Even if he's wrong (or lying) about the ADL's history, I find it far more important that he reports the truth about what they do today.
What makes you say he isn't? Do you disagree that the ADL is a tool of the Democrat party and deep state? (And no, I'm not interested in nit-picking that that's an oversimplification of both his 90 minute report and actual reality. I'll grant you that out of the gate.)
I think he's being overly generous about the origins of the ADL, but damn is he spitting some fire about its modern function.
It's funny how his personal opinions are generally so laughably awful, but he regularly knocks it out of the park when he's just reporting the facts.
Maybe, maybe not. Even if he's wrong (or lying) about the ADL's history, I find it far more important that he reports the truth about what they do today.
What makes you think he's reporting the truth?
This is a classic example of the Gell-Mann amnesia effect.
What makes you say he isn't? Do you disagree that the ADL is a tool of the Democrat party and deep state? (And no, I'm not interested in nit-picking that that's an oversimplification of both his 90 minute report and actual reality. I'll grant you that out of the gate.)