The climate change narrative insists that we are all doing something wrong. The results, they say, will be catastrophic for the planet. What we are doing wrong is: activities that put carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. That all of our private and public behaviors result in carbon dioxide emissions is pretty much true, but is carbon dioxide emission the worst thing the western consumer is doing environmentally speaking?
When is the last time you heard discussion of any other form of industrial pollution? The production of EV batteries is environmentally catastrophic. Most consumer electronics carry a similar pollution cost. While activists shout for us to stop using cars, disposable consumer products continue to dominate the market.
I’m not a fan of doomers, but I am concerned that we are covering up real ecological damage with the specter of climate change. Thoughts?
Completely and utterly false. Unsurprising coming from you.
First the ozone hole was discovered in 1983, and the Montreal Protocols were established in 1987. That isn't enough time to determine what the natural state of the ozone hole is. Its complexly bullshit to claim it is human caused, but they went ahead with it anyways, because communist, who you are helping, always do.
First there is the part where the Protocols of the Elders of Montreal actually worked. They didn't. Also.
Then there is the part where they claim that the ozone hole is "healing" when it was at its 13th largest extent. Note, the ozone hole essentially completely recovers every Antarctic winter, as ozone returns to a level that is comparable to most of the rest of the atmosphere.
Finally there is the fact that there is an ozone hole over the tropics which completely invalidates the "CFC destroy the ozone layer" model.