If you were at war with the Boer, that would make sense. The ANC were not, or at least shouldn't have been.
If Exodus is anything to go by, it would have been a sole ethnic group of jews being demographically targeted by non-jews as an act of war and enslavement, which anyone has a right to resist.
Like, if the Seminole rise up and attack the US Cavalry during the Trail of Tears march, I've got no objection to it.
So you have no objections to blacks in South Africa killing whites because of Apartheid? Or you don’t have any objections to jews killing whites because of the holocaust? You really don’t see how whites may have a problem with this? Your argument is that the religious teaching is completely isolated to thousands of years ago but that’s rubbish. Religious teachings are almost always studied within modern context. Otherwise people wouldn’t care about the lessons. Those in the jewish community are studying the talmud while having the victim mentality hammered into them.
So you have no objections to blacks in South Africa killing whites because of Apartheid?
I literally just said I DID have a problem with it you fucking idiot. "If you were at war with the Boer, that would make sense. The ANC were not, or at least shouldn't have been."
You should see the comments I've made regarding the ANC's use of that phrase explicitly, on several posts here.
Religious teachings are almost always studied within modern context. Otherwise people wouldn’t care about the lessons.
That's fucking stupid. The context of the event around the statement is what matters. You removing that context is what screws it up. It's no different from a Leftist saying you shouldn't defend yourself because the bible said: "Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its sheath, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword."; intentionally excluding the historical context that Jesus would have known he was going to be executed on the cross, and this was God's will, and fighting against the men who attacked him would have led his apostles to have been killed.
You contradict yourself. Blacks in South Africa are at war with the Boer. The midnight raids on farms with murder and rapes, and the new Apartheid laws being passed giving blacks preference over whites are proof of that. It’s revenge right? That’s how they see it. Like the jews killing their oppressors or the indians killing theirs, you said you would have no objections. I don’t recall the comments you’ve made about the ANC but it seems like you’re not being consistent here.
Leftists say a lot of things most of which are bullshit and nobody should take what they say at face value. That quote from Jesus is a lesson that needs no historical context. It’s saying we should give up violence. A wholesome lesson that would improve society today, yesterday, or tomorrow, if taken to heart.
My argument isn’t that the historical context of a statement or song or verse w/e should be ignored obviously it is important. But you cannot isolate it to that context. People read or hear things and they seek to understand it within the context of their lives. If one reads that “the tribe murdered it’s enemies and it was just” doesn’t the reader take to heart the lesson that “killing your enemies (whites) is right?”
Reminds me of that song “Kill the Boer”
If you were at war with the Boer, that would make sense. The ANC were not, or at least shouldn't have been.
If Exodus is anything to go by, it would have been a sole ethnic group of jews being demographically targeted by non-jews as an act of war and enslavement, which anyone has a right to resist.
Like, if the Seminole rise up and attack the US Cavalry during the Trail of Tears march, I've got no objection to it.
So you have no objections to blacks in South Africa killing whites because of Apartheid? Or you don’t have any objections to jews killing whites because of the holocaust? You really don’t see how whites may have a problem with this? Your argument is that the religious teaching is completely isolated to thousands of years ago but that’s rubbish. Religious teachings are almost always studied within modern context. Otherwise people wouldn’t care about the lessons. Those in the jewish community are studying the talmud while having the victim mentality hammered into them.
I literally just said I DID have a problem with it you fucking idiot. "If you were at war with the Boer, that would make sense. The ANC were not, or at least shouldn't have been."
You should see the comments I've made regarding the ANC's use of that phrase explicitly, on several posts here.
That's fucking stupid. The context of the event around the statement is what matters. You removing that context is what screws it up. It's no different from a Leftist saying you shouldn't defend yourself because the bible said: "Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its sheath, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword."; intentionally excluding the historical context that Jesus would have known he was going to be executed on the cross, and this was God's will, and fighting against the men who attacked him would have led his apostles to have been killed.
Historical context is relevant.
You contradict yourself. Blacks in South Africa are at war with the Boer. The midnight raids on farms with murder and rapes, and the new Apartheid laws being passed giving blacks preference over whites are proof of that. It’s revenge right? That’s how they see it. Like the jews killing their oppressors or the indians killing theirs, you said you would have no objections. I don’t recall the comments you’ve made about the ANC but it seems like you’re not being consistent here.
Leftists say a lot of things most of which are bullshit and nobody should take what they say at face value. That quote from Jesus is a lesson that needs no historical context. It’s saying we should give up violence. A wholesome lesson that would improve society today, yesterday, or tomorrow, if taken to heart.
My argument isn’t that the historical context of a statement or song or verse w/e should be ignored obviously it is important. But you cannot isolate it to that context. People read or hear things and they seek to understand it within the context of their lives. If one reads that “the tribe murdered it’s enemies and it was just” doesn’t the reader take to heart the lesson that “killing your enemies (whites) is right?”