Other than the 1488 crowd wanting to be able to say ‘no blacks allowed’ in certain businesses, I’m genuinely curious what else is in there that should make it get repealed?
I personally would like it not repealed mainly because I would be personally affected by said policy obviously, but I’m curious in the reasons outside of just that, if y’all have reasons other than that, as AFAIK, the CRA violates freedom of assembly in the view of people who have that opinion.
Working in tech I've seen them use "the narrative" to socially beat up lower end white guys.
Once it's accomplished that they forget about the whole "helping black people" thing and having destroyed those guys they replace them with white women and immigrants...NOT black people from the US.
In the narrative they say "we're helping black people" but then once they get done beating up white guys they forget all about the actual hiring of black people. It seems like it's actual purpose now is not fighting racism but stoking it.
Another thing...white peoples median income for the entire country is average for the country. 50% make more than the average. 50% make less.
Black people are lower. Like, 30% I think?
But here's the thing. Democrats have been running this same narrative since the 1960's and that dynamic hasn't changed. White and black people are in the same spots relative to each other in 2023 that they were in 1960.
Thomas Sowell has a bunch of stuff on that the actual real world effect of this kind of politicking hasn't helped black people at tall, and in many case locked them in place or sent them backwards.
Take the recent 'bail reform' stuff where they let violent offenders out immediately to go back home. Where do they live? In black communities. Where do they continue violence? In black communities. Who do they victimize? Mostly black people, businesses in black neighborhoods, etc.
Point I'm getting at is I don't believe they're even helping disadvantaged black people, and sometimes making things worse for them.