I don't see what could possibly go wrong with people who don't have kids and so have more time on their hands being barred from voting, I mean it's not like they would get angry at the government for such a decision right ? Or use that extra time to do something about such a restriction......right ?
Sounds like a good way to build resentment, especially if you keep up with female biased courts and so on.
Well I mean, its the only reason to exist. Failure to reproduce is a fundamental failure at life and no amount of wishing otherwise will change that. It is winning a Darwin award as a non-participation trophy. Your futile struggles against the facts of human reproduction make you an unfit dead end. It is what it is.
I don't see what could possibly go wrong with people who don't have kids and so have more time on their hands being barred from voting, I mean it's not like they would get angry at the government for such a decision right ? Or use that extra time to do something about such a restriction......right ?
Sounds like a good way to build resentment, especially if you keep up with female biased courts and so on.
They don't consider you human if you can't/don't want to be selected by a woman.
It's that simple. They will dress it up in claims that they're against childless women, but that's BS that nobody should fall for.
Well I mean, its the only reason to exist. Failure to reproduce is a fundamental failure at life and no amount of wishing otherwise will change that. It is winning a Darwin award as a non-participation trophy. Your futile struggles against the facts of human reproduction make you an unfit dead end. It is what it is.
I disagree. There are plenty of people who have kids who are still massive failures.
Women chase after ex-cons and more people in juvenile detention have had sex than MIT graduates.