How will you know it's not crafted by human hands if it's not barely-edited, mis-spelled drivel?
In fact, from the article:
These trials have already led to a flood of error-laden, plagiarized, and poorly written content due to badly implemented — and, some would argue, inherently unsuited AI models — that still have a strong tendency to make up facts.
Bold of them to assume that doesn't characterise a significant portion of their output already...
I can't imagine the AI doing any worse.
How will you know it's not crafted by human hands if it's not barely-edited, mis-spelled drivel?
In fact, from the article:
Bold of them to assume that doesn't characterise a significant portion of their output already...
Projecting much? Not necessarily wrong, but still absolutely projecting.