Virginity is an asset for prospective partners, not a liability
Diminishing returns.
A 40 year old virgin for either men or women does not indicate a well developed person. It's an indicator of larger issues that stunted their development. In an optimal world, they would already have been married and have been talking to their kids about getting grandkids.
A 20 year old virgin does not have this problem.
That is why you don't just set it as a categorical imperative. Virginity has utility, but not forever, and may indicate something besides stoicism against temptation.
You're acting like virginity is a bigger problem than being a whore which is patently absurd.
No, I'm not. I'm saying the idea of not marrying anyone who isn't a virgin isn't practical. You're building out the rest as a strawman.
There's a reason that there are infinite derogatory terms for women involving sex, but none that involve abstaining from sex.
Diminishing returns.
A 40 year old virgin for either men or women does not indicate a well developed person. It's an indicator of larger issues that stunted their development. In an optimal world, they would already have been married and have been talking to their kids about getting grandkids.
A 20 year old virgin does not have this problem.
That is why you don't just set it as a categorical imperative. Virginity has utility, but not forever, and may indicate something besides stoicism against temptation.
No, I'm not. I'm saying the idea of not marrying anyone who isn't a virgin isn't practical. You're building out the rest as a strawman.
Femcel.