She said in the media conference I saw something along the lines of “This isn’t discrimination. We’re against discrimination. But, at the same time, we simply must compensate for historical inequity, even if doing so has consequences for some…”
In other words, “we’re not racist. Oh wait, maybe we kind of are. But it’s the good kind of racism, we swear!”
It is truly amazing how the Marxists have been able to deeply ingrain the whole “historical bad things means it’s okay to hurt present people if they look like the people I think maybe might have done the bad things, though I certainly won’t go look it up” argument into so many fields and so many normies’ minds. It makes absolutely no sense if you think about in any amount at all, so it required them to basically prevent people from thinking.
Especially if your family like, is “white” (by current definition) but immigrated relatively recently to the place in question…
I’ve always found that funny.
Like, I’m almost 100% sure my family had nothing to do with the historical “invasion” of Australia, or profited from said “invasion” in any way (blaming the convicts, and later their descendants, when the former were involuntarily sent here anyway, always seemed particularly weird to me), and yet, I’m bizarrely supposed to be “punished” in the present time for people who vaguely shared my skin tone and language..?
As you say, it makes no sense. Yet here we are…
End point of this, somewhere like NZ or Canada, where there are more native descendants left, is probably civil war, and either Algeria or like Zim/South Africa…
Fortunately Australia only has like, 3% native descendants at most, however it’s the useful idiot whites that are the main problem…
But we’re not quite at NZ levels of anti-white ethnic cleansing yet. Could get there, but I sincerely hope not…
Vanuatu and PNG have also both spent the last couple of decades doing the whole “anti-white cleansing” thing. Seems to have worked out really well for both. Not…
And the health minister is a woman.
Shocked.
She said in the media conference I saw something along the lines of “This isn’t discrimination. We’re against discrimination. But, at the same time, we simply must compensate for historical inequity, even if doing so has consequences for some…”
In other words, “we’re not racist. Oh wait, maybe we kind of are. But it’s the good kind of racism, we swear!”
It is truly amazing how the Marxists have been able to deeply ingrain the whole “historical bad things means it’s okay to hurt present people if they look like the people I think maybe might have done the bad things, though I certainly won’t go look it up” argument into so many fields and so many normies’ minds. It makes absolutely no sense if you think about in any amount at all, so it required them to basically prevent people from thinking.
Yeah…
Especially if your family like, is “white” (by current definition) but immigrated relatively recently to the place in question…
I’ve always found that funny.
Like, I’m almost 100% sure my family had nothing to do with the historical “invasion” of Australia, or profited from said “invasion” in any way (blaming the convicts, and later their descendants, when the former were involuntarily sent here anyway, always seemed particularly weird to me), and yet, I’m bizarrely supposed to be “punished” in the present time for people who vaguely shared my skin tone and language..?
As you say, it makes no sense. Yet here we are…
End point of this, somewhere like NZ or Canada, where there are more native descendants left, is probably civil war, and either Algeria or like Zim/South Africa…
Fortunately Australia only has like, 3% native descendants at most, however it’s the useful idiot whites that are the main problem…
But we’re not quite at NZ levels of anti-white ethnic cleansing yet. Could get there, but I sincerely hope not…
Vanuatu and PNG have also both spent the last couple of decades doing the whole “anti-white cleansing” thing. Seems to have worked out really well for both. Not…