We do not allow political content that encourages harm to others or that supports, celebrates, or furthers the cause of violent actors and hate organizations. We may, in some places, allow pointed or harsh criticism of political figures, their policies, and governments (including satirical statements) as long as they do not otherwise violate this Code of Conduct. Read more in our Harmful Political Content policy.
EG - We'll allow whatever hate speech or political content that promotes our causes and that's perfectly ok because our cause is just and righteous and, besides, it's spelled out right here in our code of conduct!
Misleading information
We do not allow any content that promotes false, harmful, or misleading information that carries the risk of harm to a person or group of people. We also do not allow content that promotes false or misleading information for the purpose of promoting the interests of a political party, government, or ideology. Read more in our Misleading information policy.
And this is the ban on any non-political speech - like how mRNA vaccines aren't real vaxxes or sudden death syndrome.
Note this also opens the doors for them to be just like all other social media ratings systems these days and take money from corps to block speech the corps find... troubling...
EG - We'll allow whatever hate speech or political content that promotes our causes and that's perfectly ok because our cause is just and righteous and, besides, it's spelled out right here in our code of conduct!
And this is the ban on any non-political speech - like how mRNA vaccines aren't real vaxxes or sudden death syndrome.
Note this also opens the doors for them to be just like all other social media ratings systems these days and take money from corps to block speech the corps find... troubling...
I feel like I've seen a lot less of those "died suddenly" posts on Twitter of late.
Loss of interest?
Less jab harm now that booster rates have plummeted?
Twitter suppression?