I’m talking firstly physical “safety”, as exemplified by (in the city I’m currently visiting) the removal of iconic local statues that have been in place for years, because “inclusive” idiots very suddenly decided they were a “trip hazard”… Because everyone is on their phones now, and therefore don’t look where they are going. 😑
Of course, this is just a symptom of a much, much wider problem, and only “works” because we’ve spent three years being terrified of a fucking virus, and all the tribalism that brought…
But this goes much further - you have “cultural safety”, you have “safe communications”, you have “safety on campus”, you have “LGBTQ+ safe spaces” - all of which comes back to our most bizarre obsession with the primacy of feelings and feeling safe, even if, in reality, you are probably less “safe” than ever…
Some of this is worse in Australia than elsewhere (the physical “safety” stuff here is probably the worst in the world), but a lot of the other ideological stuff originated in North America…
All in all, it comes back to that saying about “freedom vs temporary safety”, I suppose, but geese, what a bleak, sanitized, generic and utterly boring society we are building, FML… 😒
Of note: the statues are of animals. They’re not ugly, or in any way degenerate, which I guess is why they have to go, lol…
They don’t block the way or anything. The only way you could really consider them a “trip hazard” is if Roy were deliberately trying to…
Which I guess is what has happened. 😑
They’ll be replaced by generic “safe” plantings and greenery, apparently. Which, uhh, I would’ve thought would be just as much of a “trip hazard”…
But then, this ideology isn’t meant to make sense, is it?
Failing its own internal logic is surely a feature, not a bug…