OP, this cites an article syndicated to MSN which itself cites a fucking Daily Beast article whose original source is “two sources that have spoken to Trump as well as a GOP strategist familiar with the discussions.”
It is empty speculation. It means literally nothing. Yes, I can buy that he might pick one of the names the article comes up with, but he also might pick someone totally different, and if the article is correct it is only because they picked the three most newsworthy GOP women, not because of any insight or information they have.
I, too, am disappointed by a lot of Trump’s decisions, but you’ve really let that turn you into a bottom of the barrel anti-Trump shill. I’m not convinced you ever supported the man; your posts are so consistently low-quality articles rushing to believe whatever the MSM says that I think you could actually be a leftist astro-turfing.
OP, this cites an article syndicated to MSN which itself cites a fucking Daily Beast article whose original source is “two sources that have spoken to Trump as well as a GOP strategist familiar with the discussions.”
It is empty speculation. It means literally nothing. Yes, I can buy that he might pick one of the names the article comes up with, but he also might pick someone totally different, and if the article is correct it is only because they picked the three most newsworthy GOP women, not because of any insight or information they have.
I, too, am disappointed by a lot of Trump’s decisions, but you’ve really let that turn you into a bottom of the barrel anti-Trump shill. I’m not convinced you ever supported the man; your posts are so consistently low-quality articles rushing to believe whatever the MSM says that I think you could actually be a leftist astro-turfing.