If it's something important from someone important, sure. But in that case the story is "Important person X said important thing Y in a tweet on Z date". The tweet is just the source. What I'm objecting to is the tired cookie cutter articles that boil down to "Person the writer doesn't like said something the writer doesn't like, and here are a bunch of Twatter randos 'calling him out'", often with inane commentary after each tweet. Ted Cruz is a particularly frequent target of this retardation for some reason.
If it's something important from someone important, sure. But in that case the story is "Important person X said important thing Y in a tweet on Z date". The tweet is just the source. What I'm objecting to is the tired cookie cutter articles that boil down to "Person the writer doesn't like said something the writer doesn't like, and here are a bunch of Twatter randos 'calling him out'", often with inane commentary after each tweet. Ted Cruz is a particularly frequent target of this retardation for some reason.