I never got the shot, but out of the dozens and dozens of people I know who got it (many getting the 3rd shot as well); not a one has had any problems. No side effects, heart attacks, etc.
Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
I think the vaxx was a big money making scam, but at this point holding on to the "it's a clot shot"/"it's a depopulation shot" idea is simply deluded.
Yeah this graph makes things look bad but there could be plenty of reasons for this sort of anomaly. At this point I am more skeptical of those trusting numbers games instead of their own experiences.
I never got the shot, but out of the dozens and dozens of people I know who got it (many getting the 3rd shot as well); not a one has had any problems. No side effects, heart attacks, etc.
Pretty sure a sample size nearing 100 should return at least ONE data point that reveals the vaxx causes problems.
I think the vaxx was a big money making scam, but at this point holding on to the "it's a clot shot"/"it's a depopulation shot" idea is simply deluded.
Yeah this graph makes things look bad but there could be plenty of reasons for this sort of anomaly. At this point I am more skeptical of those trusting numbers games instead of their own experiences.
Other vaccines were withdrawn when 1 in a thousand people were injured.
This vaxx is up to 1 in 30.
And the original disease had only a 1 in 20 million fatality rate for young people without comorbidities.
The difference? pharma $$$