Yeah, creeped me the fuck out. It's a bunch of pedos who are possibly in denial about being pedos, or they are arguing in bad faith to normalize lolicons full well knowing that it has an expression of pedophilia.
I argue plenty from a legal perspective that calling sexual attraction to age 14-17 is not pedophilia, because it literally is not under the DSM V as well as criminal law. I have been called a pedo many times on reddit for this, even though I'm objectively just correct & fighting against the term pedophile being watered down.
I don't see lolicon the same way at all. These cartoons are intended to represent very young children & appeal to sexual attraction from pedos. I can't imagine why anyone's dick would be getting hard to a cartoon child unless they're a pedo.
Yeah, creeped me the fuck out. It's a bunch of pedos who are possibly in denial about being pedos, or they are arguing in bad faith to normalize lolicons full well knowing that it has an expression of pedophilia.
I argue plenty from a legal perspective that calling sexual attraction to age 14-17 is not pedophilia, because it literally is not under the DSM V as well as criminal law. I have been called a pedo many times on reddit for this, even though I'm objectively just correct & fighting against the term pedophile being watered down.
I don't see lolicon the same way at all. These cartoons are intended to represent very young children & appeal to sexual attraction from pedos. I can't imagine why anyone's dick would be getting hard to a cartoon child unless they're a pedo.