What is the solution for the sane people out there?
a) growing comprehension about being temporary problem (life) within ongoing solution (inception towards death).
b) discerning for self the difference between suggested "insane person" and perceivable "per sonos" (being by sound) + "in sanus" (being within sound).
c) SANE, adjective [Latin sanus, sound]
How can we unite to fight back if we are all living in our own fictional realities?
a) grow comprehension about UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus, one) aka being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE...
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self discernment (being partial within whole).
c) what if the suggested fight (wanting vs not wanting suggested) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable?
people on the right and the left
Choose to take a step left, which implies coming from right. Now choose to take another step left and it still implies coming from right. There is no left or right...choice can only exist at the center of balance (left/right).
The few suggest the many to choose a side and try to hold onto it, while ignoring to be the center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
a) growing comprehension about being temporary problem (life) within ongoing solution (inception towards death).
b) discerning for self the difference between suggested "insane person" and perceivable "per sonos" (being by sound) + "in sanus" (being within sound).
c) SANE, adjective [Latin sanus, sound]
a) grow comprehension about UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus, one) aka being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE...
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self discernment (being partial within whole).
c) what if the suggested fight (wanting vs not wanting suggested) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable?
Choose to take a step left, which implies coming from right. Now choose to take another step left and it still implies coming from right. There is no left or right...choice can only exist at the center of balance (left/right).
The few suggest the many to choose a side and try to hold onto it, while ignoring to be the center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).