What is the solution for the sane people out there?
a) growing comprehension about being temporary problem (life) within ongoing solution (inception towards death).
b) discerning for self the difference between suggested "insane person" and perceivable "per sonos" (being by sound) + "in sanus" (being within sound).
c) SANE, adjective [Latin sanus, sound]
How can we unite to fight back if we are all living in our own fictional realities?
a) grow comprehension about UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus, one) aka being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE...
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self discernment (being partial within whole).
c) what if the suggested fight (wanting vs not wanting suggested) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable?
people on the right and the left
Choose to take a step left, which implies coming from right. Now choose to take another step left and it still implies coming from right. There is no left or right...choice can only exist at the center of balance (left/right).
The few suggest the many to choose a side and try to hold onto it, while ignoring to be the center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
Yes (want) vs No (not want) represents ones consent to suggested (fiction), hence the resulting conflict of reason. Meanwhile in reality...ones perceiving choice exists at the center of perceivable balance (need/want).
If one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested), then one shapes an imbalance (want vs not want). Others utilize suggestion to tempt one into imbalance, while selling this imbalance as "reason/logic"...
Consider if reasoning (yes vs no aka want vs not want) over breathing changes the "need" for one to adapt to being forced to breathe?
a) growing comprehension about being temporary problem (life) within ongoing solution (inception towards death).
b) discerning for self the difference between suggested "insane person" and perceivable "per sonos" (being by sound) + "in sanus" (being within sound).
c) SANE, adjective [Latin sanus, sound]
a) grow comprehension about UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus, one) aka being one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE...
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self discernment (being partial within whole).
c) what if the suggested fight (wanting vs not wanting suggested) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable?
Choose to take a step left, which implies coming from right. Now choose to take another step left and it still implies coming from right. There is no left or right...choice can only exist at the center of balance (left/right).
The few suggest the many to choose a side and try to hold onto it, while ignoring to be the center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
What if fiction represents ones ignorance of reality? Does one have the free will of choice to ignore reality for fiction while being within reality?
Yes (want) vs No (not want) represents ones consent to suggested (fiction), hence the resulting conflict of reason. Meanwhile in reality...ones perceiving choice exists at the center of perceivable balance (need/want).
If one ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested), then one shapes an imbalance (want vs not want). Others utilize suggestion to tempt one into imbalance, while selling this imbalance as "reason/logic"...
Consider if reasoning (yes vs no aka want vs not want) over breathing changes the "need" for one to adapt to being forced to breathe?