a) suggested truth (want) vs lies (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable change.
b) to be alive implies being moved from inception towards death, hence within constant change.
c) instead of pre- or past- truth or lies...consider being within change.
the abundant production of fake
a) nature doesn't lie, yet those within natural represent the free will of choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested). Consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore not only ignore perceivable (reality); but corrupts one to view perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction.
Example...suggested words tempts one to ignore perceivable sound.
b) being (life) within constant change (inception towards death) implies perceiving perceivable inspiration (moving differences). The few mimic this with suggested information, hence flooding ones mind/memory with ongoing fiction (information) as to tempt one to ignore ongoing reality (inspiration).
will be relatively unable to sus out the truth of things?
a) as long as ones free "will" of choice is misused to consent to the suggested information by others, so long will one ignore perceivable inspiration (moving differences aka change).
b) truth vs lies represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information....both sides consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) to be implies being partial (reaction) enabled within whole (enacting). In other words...whatever nature offers; each one within is able to react to. Consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to disable self, hence willingly ignoring ones response-ability (free will of choice).
in error
The ongoing natural order (inception towards death) sets the temporary chaos (life) within with the free will of choice to ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.]
Only while being moved from inception towards death, can life choose to wander up/down; left/right; forwards/backwards....why? Because choice can only exist at the center of balance (momentum of motion).
who knows
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", hence everyone (perceiving) knows everything (perceivable). Growing comprehension on the other hand implies self discernment by free will of choice....the suggestions by others cannot grow ones self discernment, only tempt one to repress expressed growth.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"...
authoritarians in charge
AU'THOR, noun (Latin augeo, to increase, or cause to enlarge)...ongoing loss (process of dying) represents the author of temporary growth (living). Growth represents the authorized instrument (choice) to increase (need) or decrease (want) self within loss.
a 'solution' to this problem
The few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions...an inversion of being temporary problem (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self while being dissolved.
I wont believe...
a) to believe or disbelief represents ones consent to the suggestions of another. Nature doesn't require belief, it demands adaptation from those within hence the need to adapt to thirst, hunger; lack of shelter etc.
b) suggested "won't" aka "will nothing" tempts one to ignore being free "will" of choice within "everything" (perceivable).
on a screen
Viewing perceivable (inspiration) through the lens of suggested (information) represents the mental screen of "ignorance"...the physical screens are presented everywhere to distract from that.
Sleight of hand: "exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "and we're off to never-neverland" (bye bye potential).
the leftists view on reality
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism.
b) leftism vs rightism represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested, and it doesn't matter which side one chooses, because both sides are stuck within the same conflict (reason).
Sleight of hand: "for let these be the guidestones to an age of reason" (Georgia Guidstones).
c) choice exists within perceivable balance (need/want), consenting to suggestions tempts choice into imbalance (want vs not want).
d) all conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; agreement vs disagreement; leftism vs rightism; poor vs rich; nationalism vs internationalism; democrat vs republican; capitalism vs communism; good vs evil; coke vs pepsi etc.) represent fiction (reasoning over suggested) while ignoring reality (adaptation to perceivable).
it must fit what they believe
Everyone (perceiving partial) fits into everything (perceivable whole)...consenting to suggested (leftism or rightism) tempts one to ignore fit (perceivable) for unfit (suggested).
don't believe
BELIE'VE, verb - "to credit upon the authority or testimony of another"...like those who suggested one to "do nothing" (don't).
objective
What if one represents the subject (living reaction) within an objectifying system (enacting process of dying)?
Could the few suggest "objectivism" to tempt the many to ignore being subjected?
a) suggested truth (want) vs lies (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable change.
b) to be alive implies being moved from inception towards death, hence within constant change.
c) instead of pre- or past- truth or lies...consider being within change.
a) nature doesn't lie, yet those within natural represent the free will of choice to ignore natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested). Consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore not only ignore perceivable (reality); but corrupts one to view perceivable reality through the lens of suggested fiction.
Example...suggested words tempts one to ignore perceivable sound.
b) being (life) within constant change (inception towards death) implies perceiving perceivable inspiration (moving differences). The few mimic this with suggested information, hence flooding ones mind/memory with ongoing fiction (information) as to tempt one to ignore ongoing reality (inspiration).
a) as long as ones free "will" of choice is misused to consent to the suggested information by others, so long will one ignore perceivable inspiration (moving differences aka change).
b) truth vs lies represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested information....both sides consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
c) to be implies being partial (reaction) enabled within whole (enacting). In other words...whatever nature offers; each one within is able to react to. Consenting to the suggestions of others tempts one to disable self, hence willingly ignoring ones response-ability (free will of choice).
The ongoing natural order (inception towards death) sets the temporary chaos (life) within with the free will of choice to ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.]
Only while being moved from inception towards death, can life choose to wander up/down; left/right; forwards/backwards....why? Because choice can only exist at the center of balance (momentum of motion).
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", hence everyone (perceiving) knows everything (perceivable). Growing comprehension on the other hand implies self discernment by free will of choice....the suggestions by others cannot grow ones self discernment, only tempt one to repress expressed growth.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"...
AU'THOR, noun (Latin augeo, to increase, or cause to enlarge)...ongoing loss (process of dying) represents the author of temporary growth (living). Growth represents the authorized instrument (choice) to increase (need) or decrease (want) self within loss.
The few suggest problems to tempt the many to seek solutions...an inversion of being temporary problem (living) within ongoing solution (process of dying), hence ones struggle to sustain self while being dissolved.
a) to believe or disbelief represents ones consent to the suggestions of another. Nature doesn't require belief, it demands adaptation from those within hence the need to adapt to thirst, hunger; lack of shelter etc.
b) suggested "won't" aka "will nothing" tempts one to ignore being free "will" of choice within "everything" (perceivable).
Viewing perceivable (inspiration) through the lens of suggested (information) represents the mental screen of "ignorance"...the physical screens are presented everywhere to distract from that.
Sleight of hand: "exit light" (exit comprehension) "enter night" (enter ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "and we're off to never-neverland" (bye bye potential).
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism.
b) leftism vs rightism represents the rebranding of wanting vs not wanting suggested, and it doesn't matter which side one chooses, because both sides are stuck within the same conflict (reason).
Sleight of hand: "for let these be the guidestones to an age of reason" (Georgia Guidstones).
c) choice exists within perceivable balance (need/want), consenting to suggestions tempts choice into imbalance (want vs not want).
d) all conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; agreement vs disagreement; leftism vs rightism; poor vs rich; nationalism vs internationalism; democrat vs republican; capitalism vs communism; good vs evil; coke vs pepsi etc.) represent fiction (reasoning over suggested) while ignoring reality (adaptation to perceivable).
Everyone (perceiving partial) fits into everything (perceivable whole)...consenting to suggested (leftism or rightism) tempts one to ignore fit (perceivable) for unfit (suggested).
BELIE'VE, verb - "to credit upon the authority or testimony of another"...like those who suggested one to "do nothing" (don't).
What if one represents the subject (living reaction) within an objectifying system (enacting process of dying)?
Could the few suggest "objectivism" to tempt the many to ignore being subjected?