So recently, governments have been using 'conspiracy theorist' to attack basically anyone who does not accept government narratives. If you don't believe in their good will and morality, you are a conspiracy theorist. In fact, a local paper once claimed that people who believe that politicians are corrupt, or that the media is pushing an agenda, are conspiracy theorists. So much for that.
It doesn't matter if it actually involves a conspiracy or not. For example, if you believe that 9/11 was an inside job, then you are a conspiracy theorist. However, if you believe that the Nord Stream sabotage was NOT an inside job, you are a conspiracy theorist. The only thing those two have in common is that you are not a conspiracy theorist if you say the US government did nothing wrong.
Regardless of the double standards, the problem is the conspiracies do happen. Now, what actually is a conspiracy theorist? Because there are a good number of totally whacked people out there, who believe in wildly implausible conspiracies.
My best way to explain it is as follows: people who exclusively or preferentially explain things with 'conspiracies' are conspiracy theorists.
Simply profit and self-interest.
Why do they promote immigration? So they can pay lower wages.
Yes, the Greeks already knew that the world was not flat...
Alright, but what of it?
Yes, I'm not suggesting believing everything that the regime spouts. Just wondering if a reasonable definition of CT is not someone who explains everything using conspiracies.
It isn't. There would be fewer of "us" (I assume you mean white people, which would not include me), so fewer to milk through taxes, and fewer to order around.
Get real.
When you can't support that number of animals. We're not even close to that.