Reminder that you own nothing, not even your life savings.
(www.foxnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I read about this story a while back. Supposedly the safe deposit company was a front for some money laundering, but it also had a significant number of genuine customers and all of their property got rolled up as well. I thought I read that the customers had gotten some attorneys to fight for them.
Civil asset forfeiture is an obvious violation of the Fourth Amendment. The fact that it not only survived the very first court challenge against it but has somehow proliferated to every level of law enforcement in the country shows that the justice system is really just a fucking racket.
If its the same one I'm thinking of the warrant only allowed the FBI to take the records from the company and explicitly not any safe deposit boxes.
They did any way.
Edit:
https://nypost.com/2021/06/12/fbi-aims-to-keep-valuables-86m-cash-found-in-safe-deposit-store-raid/
Eat shit you stupid peasant.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-09-30/judge-backs-fbi-beverly-hills-safe-deposit-box-raid
I hadn't heard that detail. An illegal seizure without a warrant should allow the victims to sue the agents in their individual capacity for a 14th Amendment "under color of law" violation. If it survives the FBI's inevitable challenge, the agency wouldn't be able to pay the legal bills of the agents.
Even if they don't expect to win, putting a dozen FBI agents in the position of having to pay for their own defense, potentially losing their savings and home in the process, should prompt the FBI to reconsider releasing the seized property.
LOL
https://nypost.com/2021/06/12/fbi-aims-to-keep-valuables-86m-cash-found-in-safe-deposit-store-raid/
Eat shit you stupid peasant.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-09-30/judge-backs-fbi-beverly-hills-safe-deposit-box-raid