I thought he at one point ran against some House member, and tried to find info about that, but I found was this:
Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. (born January 17, 1954) is an American environmental lawyer and author known for promoting anti-vaccine propaganda and conspiracy theories.
Now, I don't agree with Kennedy on the childhood vaccines, but this is a very strange way to talk about someone for a supposedly objective website. And while Wikipedia pretends that it's just echoing its (uniformly establishmentarian) sources, none of the sources cited for this claim say anything about 'propaganda'. I know, I know.
They removed the Democratic Party personal detail on him.
If you go back to 2020 April revision:
Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. (born January 17, 1954) is an American environmental attorney, author, and opponent of vaccination. Kennedy is a son of Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of former president John F. Kennedy. He is the president of the board of Waterkeeper Alliance, a non-profit environmental group that he helped found in 1999
If you go back to 2017 October revision you get an even more neutral stance on him:
Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy Jr. (born January 17, 1954) is an American environmental attorney, author, activist, entrepreneur, and radio host. Kennedy serves as president of the board of Waterkeeper Alliance,[1] a non-profit environmental group which he helped found in 1999. He is the chairman of World Mercury Project (WMP),[2] an advocacy group that seeks to reduce and eliminate mercury exposure from industry and pharmaceuticals such as vaccines.
I thought he at one point ran against some House member, and tried to find info about that, but I found was this:
Now, I don't agree with Kennedy on the childhood vaccines, but this is a very strange way to talk about someone for a supposedly objective website. And while Wikipedia pretends that it's just echoing its (uniformly establishmentarian) sources, none of the sources cited for this claim say anything about 'propaganda'. I know, I know.
They removed the Democratic Party personal detail on him. If you go back to 2020 April revision:
If you go back to 2017 October revision you get an even more neutral stance on him:
Removing this shows they view him as a threat. Generally it's informative to see what's not said or shown - much more so than what is.