Pertinent quote from the results section of the publication:
Most people who come from a socio-economically less favorable background do not commit more crime than people who come from a more favorable background, and it also happens that people from a more favorable background do commit crime. This means that even if there is a connection between socio-economic background and involvement in crime, that connection is weak. It is not possible to appreciably predict who will commit crimes based on knowledge of people's socio-economic background.
https://bra.se/publikationer/arkiv/publikationer/2023-03-01-socioekonomisk-bakgrund-och-brott.html
You can make the same case for all of Europe.
Again the same for the entirety of Europe, by your argument, West Asians are the Supreme race with Mesopotamia
Once again Mesopotamia and Asia.
You're ignoring the reality that Eurasian populations, when they encounter a new technology invented by another tribe, they instantly understand its value, and rapidly learn to reproduce it.
Today, even the act of building a bridge over a river is something Africans struggle with without the instruction of a foreign engineer.
That’s not what was being argued, and even under that sentiment you would have to remove have of Asia as they fall in the same category as Africa in that regard. Mesopotamia was the origin of every technology that was listed there and then later spread through Europe.
The wheel comes from Mesopotamia, yes. The spoked wheel, a MASSIVE improvement, comes from Russia.
So not only was the wheel understood and mastered by other tribes, it was improved upon.
Can you name one technological innovation a sub-saharan African group not only mastered, but improved?
Remove half of Asia? Inventors of toilet paper, gunpowder? Domesticators of the silk moth? Inventors of crucible steel!?
Using the same argument you just used for sub-Saharan Africa name one technology innovation from Malaysia, Thailand, Bengali, etc.
By that logic, those technologies should have been passed to Africa through Egypt and contact with the Nubians and Ethiopians, who regularly traded both with the African interior and with the Egyptians. No?
Which is why iron tools from the Iron Age were found as far south as Tanzania…