She's shifting the discussion topic away from her sluttery, toward her youth-and-victimhood. She's sliding the forum of public discourse, in this case. That's why I put the slide-assertion in her name, and did not address OP at all, except as respondent.
She's not groomed in ANY sense. She's as much predator as the men-involved.
It's new fangled terminology, but fits well with typical lefty motus operandi; it seemed worthwhile to apply it here. Olds like me, gotta attain to newsprök...
My writing is tilted toward complex-sometimes-hypenated-and-specific adjectives for just this reason. "Germanic tendency", you might call it. 😀
Mostly, I guarantee: I almost always mean EXACTLY what I say. I might be wring (or typo'd), but I am near-always precise.
EDIT: I am working on using active voice much more, too, as passive voice needlessly complicates communication. I re-wrote the italicized bit above, for instance. It was:
She's shifting the discussion topic away from her sluttery, toward her youth-and-victimhood. She's sliding the forum of public discourse, in this case. That's why I put the slide-assertion in her name, and did not address OP at all, except as respondent.
She's not groomed in ANY sense. She's as much predator as the men-involved.
It's new fangled terminology, but fits well with typical lefty motus operandi; it seemed worthwhile to apply it here. Olds like me, gotta attain to newsprök...
My writing is tilted toward complex-sometimes-hypenated-and-specific adjectives for just this reason. "Germanic tendency", you might call it. 😀
Mostly, I guarantee: I almost always mean EXACTLY what I say. I might be wring (or typo'd), but I am near-always precise.
EDIT: I am working on using active voice much more, too, as passive voice needlessly complicates communication. I re-wrote the italicized bit above, for instance. It was: