By calling it a partnership, she doesn't have a fiduciary duty to explain to Netflix shareholders why she allowed GM to advertise for free.
If she didn't call it a partnership, she would have had to explain why she didn't put the ad contract up for bidding from other companies for the benefit of Netflix revenues.
There's a legal reason she said that.
By calling it a partnership, she doesn't have a fiduciary duty to explain to Netflix shareholders why she allowed GM to advertise for free.
If she didn't call it a partnership, she would have had to explain why she didn't put the ad contract up for bidding from other companies for the benefit of Netflix revenues.