If anything in any of these new regulations and that new WHO Pandemic Treaty violates the U.S. Constitution then those portions theoretically can be rendered void and non binding by the U.S. SCOTUS.
Based on existing legal precedent the U.S. Constitution generally reserves the power to handle public health issues to the states under the tenth amendment.
Remember how in January of 2022, the unconstitutional OSHA vaccine mandate was struck down by SCOTUS because they ruled that OSHA doesn't have that power.
WHO tyranny in the IHR amendments and new pandemic treaty should be technically shot down as long we keep the majority on SCOTUS.
Hard to feel fully confident in SCOTUS with how squishy the three new Trump appointees are.
If anything in any of these new regulations and that new WHO Pandemic Treaty violates the U.S. Constitution then those portions theoretically can be rendered void and non binding by the U.S. SCOTUS.
Based on existing legal precedent the U.S. Constitution generally reserves the power to handle public health issues to the states under the tenth amendment.
Remember how in January of 2022, the unconstitutional OSHA vaccine mandate was struck down by SCOTUS because they ruled that OSHA doesn't have that power.
WHO tyranny in the IHR amendments and new pandemic treaty should be technically shot down as long we keep the majority on SCOTUS.
Hard to feel fully confident in SCOTUS with how squishy the three new Trump appointees are.
that is wildly optimistic, and given recent events, naive.