I used to talk with this girl. She is responsive, so as non-austicularly as I could, I would add snazzy "ha gottem" info that she agrees with cosmetically, wait for a like or reply, and then veer hard into the ethnic portion of what she just agreed with lol. She is kinda racist and I dig it, and I just know in my bones she sees through "male feminist" soy bullshit and couldn't seriously date or marry one.
I have said it a lot and I'll say it again, women generally lack agency. A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
Why would you do that? I don't think we need that unholy alliance.
A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
This is your brain on "blame everything but women". You shack up with one of these freaks, you'll pay the price.
But to answer your question I saw her say something vaguely racist and I just wanted to push it as far as I can. People want to tip toe around the hard breaks between leftist ideology and reality and they should be pushed and prodded for it
She will say/believe anything if it dehumanizes men. But the fact that she replies does give me an interesting idea. I wonder if I could catch her out and make her prove my long-held theory that transgenderism is weaponized by feminism in accordance with the SCUM Manifesto.
One thing is for sure, @ing feminist women on twitter would be more productive and probably more fun than pissing off ConPro. That forum is the definition of heels-dug-in on women. Their view reflects real life and they will only ever bully you over it. Militant feminists are actually wrong about the structure of the world. They are easy and fun.
I used to talk with this girl. She is responsive, so as non-austicularly as I could, I would add snazzy "ha gottem" info that she agrees with cosmetically, wait for a like or reply, and then veer hard into the ethnic portion of what she just agreed with lol. She is kinda racist and I dig it, and I just know in my bones she sees through "male feminist" soy bullshit and couldn't seriously date or marry one.
I have said it a lot and I'll say it again, women generally lack agency. A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
Why would you do that? I don't think we need that unholy alliance.
This is your brain on "blame everything but women". You shack up with one of these freaks, you'll pay the price.
Marriage is literally the original holy aliance
But to answer your question I saw her say something vaguely racist and I just wanted to push it as far as I can. People want to tip toe around the hard breaks between leftist ideology and reality and they should be pushed and prodded for it
And Satan was originally an angel. Your point?
She will say/believe anything if it dehumanizes men. But the fact that she replies does give me an interesting idea. I wonder if I could catch her out and make her prove my long-held theory that transgenderism is weaponized by feminism in accordance with the SCUM Manifesto.
One thing is for sure, @ing feminist women on twitter would be more productive and probably more fun than pissing off ConPro. That forum is the definition of heels-dug-in on women. Their view reflects real life and they will only ever bully you over it. Militant feminists are actually wrong about the structure of the world. They are easy and fun.