There's nothing right-wing about what you're promoting.
Never claimed to be right wing, left wing or centrist. I'm more about leveraging 'assests', opportunities and managing risks and costs.
Like if I can get the loyalty of different cultures by having a shared value system and equal treatment under a system of laws, I'd do that than risk unnecessary conflict. Similarly if I see that an outside culture is built on conflict against any not a part of it, unless I can use them to fight someone else I'd just keep them out, using force if required.
The point I was making was the over play on 'white' when there is no shared culture between Europeans, only a constant game of acquisition of power between different powers and families. Some through force and marriage. White culture is a lot more opportunistic and about gathering more to your banners by concepts with some force compared to more conflict in most of the world and conformity in China.
Because there is no clear hierarchy and insistence on assimilation, if the Romans could do it 2 millennia ago how are we so useless to not do it now or is it by design.
Having a higher power that demonstrates repercussions for acting against it tends to bring more order to the world than just trying to keep everyone isolated and segregated like it's a zoo. And that's the crux of this, these groups don't fear repercussions because states and communities turning a blind eye than immediately punishing them for not following their laws. 'Ethinic enclaves' sounds like a last resort for someone afraid to use force than a solution to this issue.
"Shared value system and equal treatment" is a pipe dream. We have tried to teach US blacks European values for over two hundred years. It hasn't worked. Other groups will band together and favor their own. These people will lie and say they support you but will betray you, even it is merely succumbing to violent primal instincts.
Never claimed to be right wing, left wing or centrist. I'm more about leveraging 'assests', opportunities and managing risks and costs.
Like if I can get the loyalty of different cultures by having a shared value system and equal treatment under a system of laws, I'd do that than risk unnecessary conflict. Similarly if I see that an outside culture is built on conflict against any not a part of it, unless I can use them to fight someone else I'd just keep them out, using force if required.
The point I was making was the over play on 'white' when there is no shared culture between Europeans, only a constant game of acquisition of power between different powers and families. Some through force and marriage. White culture is a lot more opportunistic and about gathering more to your banners by concepts with some force compared to more conflict in most of the world and conformity in China.
Because there is no clear hierarchy and insistence on assimilation, if the Romans could do it 2 millennia ago how are we so useless to not do it now or is it by design.
Having a higher power that demonstrates repercussions for acting against it tends to bring more order to the world than just trying to keep everyone isolated and segregated like it's a zoo. And that's the crux of this, these groups don't fear repercussions because states and communities turning a blind eye than immediately punishing them for not following their laws. 'Ethinic enclaves' sounds like a last resort for someone afraid to use force than a solution to this issue.
"Shared value system and equal treatment" is a pipe dream. We have tried to teach US blacks European values for over two hundred years. It hasn't worked. Other groups will band together and favor their own. These people will lie and say they support you but will betray you, even it is merely succumbing to violent primal instincts.