They knew about the student had a gun long before the shooting took place. School Administrators did nothing.
Tin Foil Hat Conclusion: They wanted the shooting to happen because of an anti-gun or anti-white narrative.
Reasonable Conclusion: They were afraid to pull a minority student aside for fear of being labeled "rayciss"
A child saying he has a gun isn't really a credible source.
And if he was so violent, why did he target the teacher and not another student?
I'm more and more sure, the more that comes out, that the teacher is a groomer who targeted the kid.
It doesn't say that anywhere in the article.
Is there actual evidence for that? Women's word is worthless, after all.
I haven't read from any official, corroborated reports, that the child threatened her before shooting.