While I was never on the bandwagon, this speech works as well as an article today as it must have back then.
Recall the 'earthquake in Pakistan' that he mentions? I don't. Neither does anyone who didn't live in the area of Pakistan affected.
It is more illustrative today than it was the day it was penned, because instead of a reference to today's catastrophes, it's a reference to one that has become largely irrelevant.
I thought the exact same thing about "that earthquake in Pakistan." As he says, there's one every 8 months. Imagine even naming the vibrations of a planet.
While I was never on the bandwagon, this speech works as well as an article today as it must have back then.
Recall the 'earthquake in Pakistan' that he mentions? I don't. Neither does anyone who didn't live in the area of Pakistan affected.
It is more illustrative today than it was the day it was penned, because instead of a reference to today's catastrophes, it's a reference to one that has become largely irrelevant.
I thought the exact same thing about "that earthquake in Pakistan." As he says, there's one every 8 months. Imagine even naming the vibrations of a planet.
And yet has all the same markers and movements.