This was always the case and because she got a lick of fame.
Maybe this will help explain it.
When we grow up, our parents have authority over us and we as children intrinsically respect this authority to some degree. Perhaps it's because we know at some level, our parents feed us, house us and take care of us. Who knows but surely you remember the time of your life when your parents had this authority over you and you would have listened to your parents even if they told you something you disliked. As you gained your independence though, you started to become "your own man" or whatever. Your parents' authority over you diminished.
You'll notice that women are very much the same. Often, the best behaved and nicest girl turns into the worst feminist imaginable after they go off to college and gain independence from their parents. Peterson's influence on his daughter became next to nothing as she got older and started to gain this independence. A lot of conservative parents mistake the strength of their influence over social media, education and society proper. Women are easily influenced by the government and its institutions more so than the "strongest man". Women also have their own nature which when left unchecked and in fact is allowed to flourish thanks to our society, it leads to certain outcomes.
Peterson's daughters behavior is fully expected. If she didn't act the way she did, I'd say she's a large exception. Anyway, just make your bed goy and all your problems will disappear.
A lot of conservative parents mistake the strength of their influence over social media, education and society proper. Women are easily influenced by the government and its institutions more so than the "strongest man".
Excellent point here, and their mentality really is a fool's errand and non-solution. These individualist types don't have any solutions. All they do is shout into the void for people to behave themselves better while removing none of the incentives or negative influences. Their whole function, including and especially that of Peterson, is to encourage dissenters to seek individualistic solutions to systemic problems, thereby preserving the status quo.
This was always the case and because she got a lick of fame.
Maybe this will help explain it.
When we grow up, our parents have authority over us and we as children intrinsically respect this authority to some degree. Perhaps it's because we know at some level, our parents feed us, house us and take care of us. Who knows but surely you remember the time of your life when your parents had this authority over you and you would have listened to your parents even if they told you something you disliked. As you gained your independence though, you started to become "your own man" or whatever. Your parents' authority over you diminished.
You'll notice that women are very much the same. Often, the best behaved and nicest girl turns into the worst feminist imaginable after they go off to college and gain independence from their parents. Peterson's influence on his daughter became next to nothing as she got older and started to gain this independence. A lot of conservative parents mistake the strength of their influence over social media, education and society proper. Women are easily influenced by the government and its institutions more so than the "strongest man". Women also have their own nature which when left unchecked and in fact is allowed to flourish thanks to our society, it leads to certain outcomes.
Peterson's daughters behavior is fully expected. If she didn't act the way she did, I'd say she's a large exception. Anyway, just make your bed goy and all your problems will disappear.
Excellent point here, and their mentality really is a fool's errand and non-solution. These individualist types don't have any solutions. All they do is shout into the void for people to behave themselves better while removing none of the incentives or negative influences. Their whole function, including and especially that of Peterson, is to encourage dissenters to seek individualistic solutions to systemic problems, thereby preserving the status quo.