I'm getting in early so I can win 'Transphobe of the year 2023'
Joking aside, we've seen in the past decades, although I'd argue a century at least, how women's roles have changed in WESTERN society. The result, increased depression and stress rates, lower birth rates, more people maiming themselves to 'turn into a woman' and truly evil amounts of abortions each year.
And part of the problem is shifting the concept of femininity, if you ask the feminists you seem to get a response of being a man-whore (acting with behaviours associated with men along with free to sleep around with no attachments), the left say it can be applied to anyone that identifies as female (which is why they try to shift goal posts to include men with femininity) and the right at least focuses on being a competent mother first.
We can all see how this has translated in our media, we went from supporting wives and girlfriends caring for the kids while helping their man overcoming their enemies to women being invincible warriors and all men are dumb so why be tied down to one.
I think a lot of this push to change what femininity means comes from a fundamental aspect of it, it has an element of submission to it. Not in a full 'Handmaid's tale' that feminists like to jerk off to, but there seems to an element of willingly placing yourself behind a man and supporting him in life, something that is consitently mocked and belittled in western media and social media now.
It's one aspect of why western media is dying because of what they portray isn't femininity but men in female skinsuits. I'll stop it here so it doesn't become an essay but I do think the rejection of femininity is one aspect of our current societal collapse.
The only thing that you need to know is that they think a gynocracy is better than a patriarchy, but thus far we've seen that the 'gynocratic examples' that they've given us are several times worse than patriarchal structures. They're corrupt, incompetent, unreliable, violent, venal, racist, deceitful, underhanded,untrustworthy, malevolent and enshrine bigotry.
Worse even, is that they're trying to justify rule by women by dragging in diversity, inclusion and equity (DIE) as a be-all and end-all cause. Whenever a woman takes charge of an organization, there is always the concomitant 'diversity' spiel, which means white men get demonized, slighted and marginalized in favor of a whole host of glamorized 'minority' groups. "Are you a minority t-o-o-o-o-o-o?"
It's all so predictable and repulsive.
Long ago when I was still in university and blind to the culture wars, my anthropology professor taught a few lectures on Europe's transition from the Stone to Bronze Ages, and how the patriarchal bronze-wielding Indo-Europeans burst from what's now the Russo-Ukrainian steppe atop their horses & chariots to conquer the peaceful matriarchal Pre-Indo-European peoples of Neolithic Europe. The Indo-Europeans even worshiped Dyeus Phther, the prototypical male 'sky father' deity who they acknowledged as the greatest of the gods and certainly the dominant partner in his union with Dheghom the earth-mother, while the Pre-Indo-Europeans were basically described as harmless simps responsible for making all those 'Venus of X' Neolithic sculptures depicting thicc goddesses whose names have been lost to time (well, I'm sure she didn't intend for her lectures to be interpreted in that way at the time).
I assume the Indo-Europeans were supposed to be the bad guys in her retelling, but the society of the pre-Indo-Europeans never managed to evolve beyond the village level. They were sedentary Stone Age farmers, their lives couldn't have been that great and they probably hadn't even domesticated cattle yet (that started with aurochs over in Anatolia), nor horses for sure (domesticated by the Indo-Europeans). Northern Europeans being on average at least slightly taller than Southern Europeans was attributed to the latter having a greater admixture of Indo-European genes, since their mixed diet incorporating larger quantities of meat & milk from pastoral animals was more nutritious and better-balanced than the mostly cereal diet (with a few game animals occasionally tossed in) consumed by the pre-Indo-Euro farmers.
Tl;dr matriarchal societies have been tried before and they almost never got past the Stone Age, nor did their organization evolve beyond 'small villages led by headwomen and shamans', hence why they were so easily overrun by competitors - the only exception I can think of were possibly the Minoans, who in any case still ended up getting overwhelmed and conquered by a more militaristic patriarchal civilization (the Mycenaean Greeks) anyway. Male leadership and energy seems to be a prerequisite for high civilization and post-subsistence standards of living.