The game contains some sexual material: a character caressing and straddling a man in bed;
"A character". I suppose it's a chocobo? It isn't a man, after all, they note a man later in the line. If it were a woman, well, that's a term on par with man, it'd be used there. So it must be a non-human, right?
"A character". I suppose it's a chocobo? It isn't a man, after all, they note a man later in the line. If it were a woman, well, that's a term on par with man, it'd be used there. So it must be a non-human, right?
Kuwupo.
Maybe they didn't have a biologist on hand to confirm if it was a woman or not. And considering the game is Japanese we can never rule out traps.
That said it's probably just woke shit making everything lose meaning again.
Assuming that is still the case then that is good to hear. The less woke infiltration the better
Either that, or it's faggotry, and the ESRB feels compelled to mention it while avoiding getting torched for 'giving a game an M because faggotry'.