Are people tired of these yet? Kering Foundation, Part 4 - The quiet part out loud.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Alright, so basically, it's female genetics but women with power and influence use their power and influence to promote what their biological drice directs them towards and the overall outcome given women's genetics is a world without men?
So would you say the main female code is that women hate men and see men as nothing more than a unfortunate need. The can't live with them, can't live without them? So ideally, if women could find a way to live without men, that is what their biological impulses drive them toward seeking?
I would say that's pretty accurate.
I guess I have to say the obvious to avoid R16 - people can move past base instincts..
I actually don't understand what you just said when you said you were saying the obvious.. what?
Saying that women's base instinct is to hate us probably breaks the rules, so you have to clarify that it is possible to ignore those instincts.
You would be the rule expert on this... Lol. It's also possible for a tiger to act like a housecat but eventually those instincts catch up to even the best of tigers. Who were those magicians again...?
I hate our obsession with exceptions to rules. Even if one woman can break free of her instincts and act differently, unless the vast majority do, the fact that one did is irrelevant because it will have absolutely no impact on society as a whole. Basing how we act and adapt to reality on exceptions is a recipe for disaster. If exceptions don't want to be treated like the norm then it's up to the exceptions to change the norm.