Insurance - or, at least, state-mandated insurance, is also a great way for the government to regulate private industry. The government just insists that citizens obtain insurance for risky activities that may affect others. Valid insurance, of course, where the government itself defines "valid", to mean "Complies with regulatory dictates".
Potentially, it's a great way to force people to use state digital currencies, as these would be the only ones that government-approved insurers would touch, by arrangement.
Not pictured: The intelligence community's cyber squads continuously hacking unregulated crypto markets to scare people into holding only insured currencies.
Insurance companies exist on people paying for coverage on things that the company knows happens so infrequently that they'll turn a profit. So this company offers to insure against hacking (not phishing which is how most stuff is stolen online).
There's another company that appears to be linked to this one, and a branch of the Crown Prosecution Service linked to them as advisors. Both this company in the post and the linked company received US federal grants. They're all called Soteria as well, which is weird. Why would you name all the corrupt tentacles of your plan the same thing?
But I need to do more research to make sure I'm absolutely correct on this. This will either be the thing that launches me out of "tinfoil woman rants" and to an actual theory that doesn't lean heavily on knowledge of feminist texts, or one of those things AoV brings up every single time to mock me jumping to conclusions.
Insurance - or, at least, state-mandated insurance, is also a great way for the government to regulate private industry. The government just insists that citizens obtain insurance for risky activities that may affect others. Valid insurance, of course, where the government itself defines "valid", to mean "Complies with regulatory dictates".
Potentially, it's a great way to force people to use state digital currencies, as these would be the only ones that government-approved insurers would touch, by arrangement.
Not pictured: The intelligence community's cyber squads continuously hacking unregulated crypto markets to scare people into holding only insured currencies.
Well, would crypto insurance protect you from another FTX?
Insurance companies exist on people paying for coverage on things that the company knows happens so infrequently that they'll turn a profit. So this company offers to insure against hacking (not phishing which is how most stuff is stolen online).
I want to see how you tie this to women.
There's another company that appears to be linked to this one, and a branch of the Crown Prosecution Service linked to them as advisors. Both this company in the post and the linked company received US federal grants. They're all called Soteria as well, which is weird. Why would you name all the corrupt tentacles of your plan the same thing?
But I need to do more research to make sure I'm absolutely correct on this. This will either be the thing that launches me out of "tinfoil woman rants" and to an actual theory that doesn't lean heavily on knowledge of feminist texts, or one of those things AoV brings up every single time to mock me jumping to conclusions.